No, not at all. I'm not the OP. I'm pointing out that there is no such thing as didactic rule of law in the US anymore. Legal definitions are contorted to best serve the interests of the uniparty.
I think OPs suggestion to leverage legal definitions is fruitless in the face of a system that rules inductively.
No, not at all. I'm not the OP. I'm pointing out that there is no such thing as didactic rule of law in the US anymore. Legal definitions are contorted to best serve the interests of the uniparty.
I think OPs suggestion to leverage legal definitions is fruitless in the face of a system that rules inductively.
(post is archived)