Making Logic Of Capitol Hill | Poal: Say what you want.

1.1K

• (edited )

There are 4 possible groups in the Capitol Hill narrative:

Right Wing - "Patriots"
Right Wing - Useful Idiots
Left Wing - Provocateurs
Federal Agents

To each of these groups we must apply the questions:

a) Did enough voter fraud exists to change the outcome of the election b) If so, was their actions justified c) And most importantly what did they have to gain

I believe (A) to be axiomatic and provable in another post, if need be.

1B/C - Should the actions of CH be taken by Patriots, then without a doubt the actions are justified. They, like I, truly believe the election was rigged and require a forensic audit of Dominion Voting machines. This actions have democratic integrity to gain. However, not certainly the best means to attain it as this message was not publicly conveyed.

2B/C - Should the actions of CH be taken by Useful Idiots, the first question must be who are the puppeteers and what do they have to gain? 2's actions wouldn't be justified as they would not be their own and they would have nothing to personally gain.

3B/C - This group would have the most to gain by corralling Group 2 into a the actions of CH. The evidence of control is most notable in this . This video, like others, shows that people were let into the building. Factor this in with the and clearly this was was not a 'violent riot'.

What would Provocateurs have to gain from a False Flag; The banning of POTUS on all major social platforms, including email, with additional bans to key members of his staff; The removal of other social mediums like Parlor; The labeling of any of Trump supporters or actions of CH as "" and White .

One must ask themselves, how can so little people storm one of the most important federal buildings on the most contest election in recent memory, with one of the most divisive Presidents on a day that had a creditable ?

overpower a police force?

4B/C - Without a doubt Federal Agents would have been on the ground. Likely for both the left and the right. The LFA would assist Provocateurs in their effort to False Flag Trump supporters. The RFA, only purpose would be to deter escalation or retriever assets such as .

There are 4 possible groups in the Capitol Hill narrative: 1. Right Wing - "Patriots" 2. Right Wing - Useful Idiots 3. Left Wing - Provocateurs 4. Federal Agents To each of these groups we must apply the questions: a) Did enough voter fraud exists to change the outcome of the election b) If so, was their actions justified c) And most importantly what did they have to gain I believe (A) to be axiomatic and provable in another post, if need be. **1B/C** - Should the actions of CH be taken by Patriots, then without a doubt the actions are justified. They, like I, truly believe the election was rigged and require a forensic audit of Dominion Voting machines. This actions have democratic integrity to gain. However, not certainly the best means to attain it as this message was not publicly conveyed. **2B/C** - Should the actions of CH be taken by Useful Idiots, the first question must be who are the puppeteers and what do they have to gain? 2's actions wouldn't be justified as they would not be their own and they would have nothing to personally gain. **3B/C** - This group would have the most to gain by corralling Group 2 into a the actions of CH. The evidence of control is most notable in this [video clip](https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1347596278583197698). This video, like others, shows that people were let into the building. Factor this in with the [police selfies](https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/ae29ce2225e11ea8f9b3065e55988dcc?width=650) and clearly this was was not a 'violent riot'. What would Provocateurs have to gain from a False Flag; The banning of POTUS on all major social platforms, including email, with additional bans to key members of his staff; The removal of other social mediums like Parlor; The labeling of any of Trump supporters or actions of CH as "[domestic terrorists](https://www.dw.com/en/joe-biden-slams-pro-trump-mob-as-domestic-terrorists/a-56163969)" and White [supremacists](https://time.com/5927685/white-supremacism-threat-outlast-trump/) . One must ask themselves, how can so little people storm one of the most important federal buildings on the most contest election in recent memory, with one of the most divisive Presidents on a day that had a creditable [Terrorist Threat](https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38571/ominous-iran-related-threat-to-fly-plane-into-capitol-broadcast-to-air-traffic-controllers)? [edit] And how can [old feeble lady](https://files.catbox.moe/ejgu6z.jpg) overpower a police force? **4B/C** - Without a doubt Federal Agents would have been on the ground. Likely for both the left and the right. The LFA would assist Provocateurs in their effort to False Flag Trump supporters. The RFA, only purpose would be to deter escalation or retriever assets such as [Pelosi's Laptop](https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/533384-laptop-stolen-from-pelosis-office-during-capitol-riots).

(post is archived)