Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

201
https://nitter.net/arthur_affect/status/1347119992462970880 https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1347119992462970880 [Must be nice to have special privileges on twatter.](https://files.catbox.moe/kb9c46.png)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (141).
[–] • 0 pt

It's obvious, as obvious as "election interference." If you don't see it, it's your issue.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Thank you for proving my point, if you have to retreat to "if you can't see it it is your problem" kinds of rebuttals then you very obviously can't think of anything with any substance.

[–] • 0 pt

Good. So "rigged election" falls in the same category.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I mean, I never in this discussion claimed that it was rigged or not rigged so that is irrelevant to this discussion. You can try to deflect all you want, but really all it is is that you realize you don't actually have a valid argument so you are trying to change the topic into an area that you think you will actually have a valid argument for. It is a cowardly move that just further strengthens my assertion that you have zero substance to your claim.