![Free speech is dead. [2350x3011 - 1.03MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/KAGCm1.jpg){kind=link}
Ballots that need adjudicating are separated from the rest , then go to a voter review panel who then 'discern voter intent', a new ballot is then created and the original ballot is then discarded. The new ballot has no signature if even a signature audit is ordered. According to recent State supreme court rulings - Impartial poll watchers only have to be able to 'observe' (be in the same general area) not actually be abl to see what is actually marked or written on ballots. Georgia had 106 000 ballots total adjudicated. How can we be sure 'voter intent ' was accurate, when impartial poll watchers are not able to visually see/ compare what originally was written, how can that ballot satisfy being verified in an audit if there is no signature. This is the problem, that people are not made aware of by the msm etc, who declared from election night 'absolutely no widespread fraud enough to change the election' without any 'investigating' .... Even if the 3000 plus counties have no level of discernable fraud, it only needs 4/6 counties with 'just enough' fraud or irregularities to 'determine ' the outcome of those states - which in turn impacts on the final National verdict.
Were the people you spoke to, involved in any of the handful of counties where the majority of irregularities supposedly occurred or were they from the other 3000 counties or so ??? ....
You’re pointing out a minor gap that ‘might have been’ exploited.
Your gap was probably exploited last night. I don’t know that, but there possibly could have been. How could I know?
The reason your gap wasn’t exploited was because the probability is low. You’d have to plan to have X amount of ‘free ballots’, have them all be Trump, and change them to Biden. Did you see the nigs working these places?
I’m not for wasting more taxpayer money for shitty investigations (see: Mueller Report), but if it shuts people the fuck up then go ahead.
What ???. It might have happened, you don't know, it possibile could have , but you're not sure ??. You don't think so,bc the probability is low ??. _ Thats you're answer to why vote fraud / irregularities didn't happen ??.
For a start, it sounds like your defense is that- 'you don't even know if there were enough actual physical excess ballots to manipulate' ??. That You'd have to plan for it ?? - omg thats what election committees and election oversight officials are tasked with doing. Duh, and Georgia had 106 000 'extra ballots' to adjudicate to be counted on the night, 106 000 (in just one county , 70% of their total vote count) and other counties also extended the election voting process to allow up to an extra week to cure/ count/process and adjudicate ballots. So if one were too be completely honest, that low probability you assume actually and logically all points to all the various connected parts of this process being purposely facilitated (and bypassing state legislatures election law amendments) to enable this scenario .... Low probability = High possibility.
(post is archived)