Are you a dumbass nigger faggot? NO. it is not.
It is to subliminally condition white women into accepting a nigger as a mate. If they follow through with it the white bloodline is ended. It is another tool the kikes use in the genocide of Europeans.
It is to subliminally condition white men into accepting interracial relationships instead of having the correct knee jerk gut wrenching disgust like a normal person would have.
Way to miss the point. Of course that's what it is, but OP's argument turns the progressive machine against itself.
There is not one spoke of of that machine turning here on poal.
If he wants to copy and paste faggot shit from thedonald.win phrase it as such.
The progressives are all about cognitive dissonance. They don't care.
It is white genocide, but idk if it's that direct or intentional. I don't think the globalist kikes really care who's breeding with who, as long as no one has a real culture or identity, and as long as everyone is a mindless slave to materialism and consumerism. It's not like most of the white people having kids these days are oldschool traditionalists. Most of them are the same materialist retards and they're raising the next gen of soys and cucks. Kikes just want everyone to be as interchangeable as possible so when they dump a load of biomass into the US or Europe from shithole-istan, no one will complain and they won't have trouble mixing in and procreating to create even more biomass.
The elimination of high-caste, high-IQ, impressive whites is the top priority.
but idk if it's that direct or intentional.
Are you kidding? The portrayals of black and white couples in advertising has literally skyrocketed in the last few years. Even ten year ago it was anathema. Of course it's intentional.
I've worked in advertising, and fashion. The use of diversity in advertising started out as a way of appealing to wider markets. The use of diverse couples wasn't a decision made by an executive on a sneaky Jewish payroll or something. It was a casting director, or a creative team, or a marketing team in a meeting saying: 'We should have more diversity in this shoot.' Nobody would ever say that was a bad idea, even if 99% of the target market were indigenous western european (white). The person saying 'we should have more diversity' probably honestly believes that overrepresentation of minority demographics will solve the 'problems of whiteness' in their industry, despite being unable to identify what those problems might actually be.
But why is it always black men + white or asian women?
The people in advertising want their models to look attractive. Even if they're plus size, they're still casting model with attractive looking faces. A lot of attractiveness is based on amplified features of manliness or womanliness. I'm talking about jaw lines, cheek bones, foreheads, eye size and shape, etc. This isn't to say that black men are more manly looking than white men (although in many cases this is true), it's that its easier to cast a more manly looking black man than a more womanly looking black woman, because fewer black women fit the mold of attractive when measured against all races. So if they're casting an attractive couple and want to include some diversity, but casting an attractive black woman is difficult, the woman ends up being white or asian, and the man ends up being white or black. For similar reasons, but in reverse, you rarely see asian men cast in manly roles, because their biological manliness features aren't as pronounced, in general terms. In short, the stock of attractive black women models for these couple shoots is in short supply.
(post is archived)