They're not always that bright [1079x859 - 75KB]

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (38).

[–] • 0 pt

Im not talking about us being nicer people you dopey cunt, its about how you define intelligence. Not being able to create, only being able to subvert what the "nicer people" have created. Its not a sign of of a terribly high IQ is it? "Verbal intelligence" is just more jew trickery. Its for the intellectually weak. Because underneath they're dumb as a bag of hammers.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

>Its not a sign of of a terribly high IQ is it?

If you're able to collectively usurp all of humanity's contributions without contributing anything in return, merely by word-weaseling them and playing them against each other without their knowledge... that's a high-IQ play whether you want to admit it or not.

How fucking smart are your people if they're being literally destroyed by the scheming of another group you think is stupid? How fucking smart are you, really, if you're able to invent anti-gravity and unlimited energy devices, but get easily outwitted by a wordy little fuck into giving them away to your enemies?

Deception is the Art of War, and the kikes are the world's master deceivers.

>"Verbal intelligence" is just more jew trickery. Its for the intellectually weak. Because underneath they're dumb as a bag of hammers.

You can't beat your chest and claim your people are smart and your enemy is dumb, when your people are being outmaneuvered and lead to their own demise by the people you're claiming aren't as intelligent.

It's fucking retarded to keep underestimating your enemy by conflating your peoples' predisposition toward nobility and industriousness with being more intelligent. The guy who gains the world without contributing anything to it is, unfortunately, the smartest person in the room.

Nobody gives a fuck about all the various rocket scientists working at SpaceX, but everyone knows Elon Musk because he knew how to take advantage of the abilities of other people.

Wake up, dude. Your people are admirable and noble, and that's exactly why they're getting wiped out.

Not a very high-IQ move to be eradicated by your own compulsive empathy.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

There ain't no beating my chest going on here.

Narcissism takes advantage of our compulsive empathy that's absolutely true. And im well fuckng aware its the reason were being wiped out. But its a parasite/host relationship. The parasite has evolved strategies that are specific to the host. This is what I'm saying.

Theyve been honing these strategies for thousands of years, but its been done in the same shotgun manner as the narc throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. They don't have a conscious understanding of why what they do works. Hence, I don't think they deserve much in the way of credit for it. Narcs aren't genius manipulators, they're just incredibly egotistical, and have brass balls.

The guy who gains the world without contributing anything to it is, unfortunately, the smartest person in the room.

Personally, i thinks thats absolutely ridiculous. And I don't think saying intelligence and nobility are interrelated is conflating disparate concepts together at all. Its sounds pretty reasonable if you ask me.

Verbal intelligence is supposed to mean (according to the first search results I plugged in) - "the ability to understand and reason using concepts framed in words. More broadly, it is linked to problem solving, abstract reasoning, and working memory." Or---

"Verbal-linguistic intelligence handles the production of language, including poetry, metaphors, similes, grammar, literature, tongue twisters, and abstract reasoning."

Doesn't that sound more like us than them?

I think weve been jewed into believing the evil side of the verbal intelligence coin is the one that deserves the credit. Its what happens with everything. Its all part of their war on language, trying to invert meanings. We end up saying subversive behaviour must equal intellectual capacity. You are conflating the subversion of the thing, with the thing itself.

Not a very high-IQ move to be eradicated by your own compulsive empathy.

No. No it isn't. But then its not a hi IQ move to subvert the host organism right out of existence either, is it?

But you know, by that logic were all retards... I'm fine with this. I just don't think we should give our enemy credit it doesn't deserve.

There ain't no beating my chest going on here. Narcissism takes advantage of our compulsive empathy that's absolutely true. And im well fuckng aware its the reason were being wiped out. But its a parasite/host relationship. The parasite has evolved strategies that are specific to the host. This is what I'm saying. Theyve been honing these strategies for thousands of years, but its been done in the same shotgun manner as the narc throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. They don't have a conscious understanding of why what they do works. Hence, I don't think they deserve much in the way of credit for it. Narcs aren't genius manipulators, they're just incredibly egotistical, and have brass balls. >The guy who gains the world without contributing anything to it is, unfortunately, the smartest person in the room. Personally, i thinks thats absolutely ridiculous. And I don't think saying intelligence and nobility are interrelated is conflating disparate concepts together at all. Its sounds pretty reasonable if you ask me. Verbal intelligence is supposed to mean (according to the first search results I plugged in) - "the ability to understand and reason using concepts framed in words. More broadly, it is linked to problem solving, abstract reasoning, and working memory." Or--- "Verbal-linguistic intelligence handles the production of language, including poetry, metaphors, similes, grammar, literature, tongue twisters, and abstract reasoning." Doesn't that sound more like *us* than them? I think weve been jewed into believing the evil side of the verbal intelligence coin is the one that deserves the credit. Its what happens with everything. Its all part of their war on language, trying to invert meanings. We end up saying subversive behaviour must equal intellectual capacity. You are conflating the subversion of the thing, with the thing itself. >Not a very high-IQ move to be eradicated by your own compulsive empathy. No. No it isn't. But then its not a hi IQ move to subvert the host organism right out of existence either, is it? But you know, by that logic were *all* retards... I'm fine with this. I just don't think we should give our enemy credit it doesn't deserve.

parent
link