WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Something tells me they have a different definition of taking children seriously than I do.

Edit: It is. They believe coercion of any kind to be bad for the development of a child's mind. Child rape is a form of coercion, so I don't quite see how this anarchist theory facilitates child rape.

[–] 0 pt

Agreed. Read my comment above (if you please). I think OP misinterpreted the article, further there is a great quotation that I copied.

[–] 2 pts

I saw it, and agreed.

It's strange how far anarchism differs from my own ideas, and yet how much of what they say is something I agree with (obviously minus the antifa tier pro+faggotry cringe)

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, you nailed the benefit of not being in an echo-chamber right on the head. Didn't used to, but these days I hate the left (I think most people do) but even they can have the occasional good idea.

Ethically, I like Anarchy- A=without Archon= law makers. What right gives some war-hawk, neocon and their stooges at lockheed martin to dictate my behavior by putting words to paper? To steal my money and give it to israel and pakistan? To redistribute it to blacks who are unable or unwilling to care for themselves?

It seems that government in a social species is just a necessary evil, but I'd love to be wrong. I'd love there to be some technology to set us free from the archons. Governance without governors. Just don't think it will ever happen.