WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

469

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

I'm not sure I can make this more clear for you, because you apparently cant comprehend what I am saying. I know all about the gay frogs and tranny lizards...I get that. I never once fucking said that poisoned water doesnt lead to being poisoned you fucking retard. Now read what I am about to say slowly so it will make some sense to you. Whatever it is you believe is infecting people to turn them gay (I'm not saying that's not happening) Why are the other people who are exposed to these EXACT SAME POISONS not turning gay?

If you cant answer that one question, there is no point to continue wasting my time with you.....I'll repeat it again just in case you were too dumb to get it the first time.

WHY DOES THE "POISON" TURN ONLY SOME PEOPLE GAY AND NOT OTHERS??

[–] 0 pt

"Whatever it is you believe is infecting people to turn them gay (I'm not saying that's not happening) Why are the other people who are exposed to these EXACT SAME POISONS not turning gay?"

Hey retard. I didn't say you, me or anyone drinking said water turns you gay. I just pointed out the actual results of the research. If you'd read it like you claimed you did (you didn't) you'd see the majority of the wild life was effected, thus they were able to come that conclusion. No one has disputed that research either. You are wasting your time on a discussion that's already over. The poisoned water turned everything exposed to it gay. The end. None of the animals "made a choice" or were "born that way." They were poisoned which effected their chemical balances in their bodies which mutated them. Period. You have no counter argument to those points or ever will.

"Why are the other people who are exposed to these EXACT SAME POISONS not turning gay?"

What people retard? They didn't do human experiments or be allowed to do so because they'd be admitting to murdering people since the pesticide that's mention IS FATAL FOR PEOPLE TO CONSUME. You are beyond retarded if you didn't figure that out by now.

"If you cant answer that one question"

Ah yes the "what about this scenario that isn't recorded or can be done" question which you know is bullshit? That's a argument technique called "moving the goal post" when you can't admit you are wrong or accept the answer so you try to divert the argument in another direction. Not going to work. Why can't you accept the results? Is it a harsh reality check that the environment you grew up in made you who you are? That it wasn't biological at all? Welcome to reality.

"WHY DOES THE "POISON" TURN ONLY SOME PEOPLE GAY AND NOT OTHERS??"

Show us research where they were allowed to test the water on people. Till then, you have no argument. You lose.

You're the one saying the chemicals turn them gay. Why do you claim this and then say no research has been done on people? I never lose

[–] 0 pt (edited )

"You're the one saying the chemicals turn them gay."

No, the research that you claimed to read (which you clearly didn't) said so. No one has disputed it or debunked it either. Huh, it's like they researched what was in water, measured for a set period of time, recorded and presented evidence of the after effects the pesticide did to the water and all the animals that lived in it. Wow. Imagine that. Well you don't have to if you read the research instead of lying that you did.

"Why do you claim this and then say no research has been done on people?"

It's why we still do animal testing retard. We can safely determine if it is fit for human consummation and the researchers heavily advised against doing so. Wow, imagine that, actually reading the investigative reports instead of lying that you did.

" I never lose"

You instantly lost when you lied about reading the research and yet are still ask questions the research already answered. Take the L bro. You just embarrassed yourself and your community.