Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

They attend these riots and stand on the edges in their $700 dollar winter coats, cellphones in hand, to capture these chimp-outs for the sake of having salacious material to post to their social media - as though they were attending a circus.

They memorize their liberal scripts and talking points, and they bandy them around like a badge that gets them in the club, so they can stand at the outskirts and have the nigger-experience-for-a-day.

They are RACIAL TOURISTS. They treat all of this like a day at the amusement park. They cheer on the circus animals as they destroy a Starbucks, with their cameras out and their fanny packs on, so they can send their social media 'post cards' to their other cosmopolitan white friends, as if to say, "Yeah, spent a really exciting day being a black ally. Would recommend."

EDIT: Think of it in terms of this label's capacity to promote division among their ranks. Use it wherever it is relevant.

They attend these riots and stand on the edges in their $700 dollar winter coats, cellphones in hand, to capture these chimp-outs for the sake of having salacious material to post to their social media - as though they were attending a circus. They memorize their liberal scripts and talking points, and they bandy them around like a badge that gets them in the club, so they can stand at the outskirts and have the nigger-experience-for-a-day. They are RACIAL TOURISTS. They treat all of this like a day at the amusement park. They cheer on the circus animals as they destroy a Starbucks, with their cameras out and their fanny packs on, so they can send their social media 'post cards' to their other cosmopolitan white friends, as if to say, "Yeah, spent a really exciting day being a black ally. Would recommend." EDIT: Think of it in terms of this label's capacity to promote division among their ranks. Use it wherever it is relevant.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I also like that term, but it lacks the punch of 'raical tourist'. Racial tourist gets a clear hypocritical image across with zero effort. With loxism, you rely on a person knowing the definition, and if not, it requires an explanation. It's already over. We want something pithy and clear.

It actually utilizes their weapon of the bourgeois against them. I relish the ability to turn their own cultural philosophy against them.

With 'racial tourist' you immediately conjure the picture of a naive white person with a fanny pack and a camera documenting something they fundamentally find primitive, so it communicates the hypocrisy and the shallowness of their 'allied relations' perfectly.

[–] • 0 pt

why not both. call them many names

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

Impact is definitely a thing but in this case it misdirects from the actual root threat. "Loxist bigots" nails it. People who are too dumb or too lazy to look up "loxist" are lost causes anyway. At least at this point in the counter-narrative signaling.