That's not a surprise. It depends on which writers your talking about. There is two versions of the bible after all which is the old testament, and the new testament(the part where jesus appears).
Do you have absolute evidence that the writers of the bible wrote the new testament before jesus was born?
Also it's interesting how you put "Jesus was..." without mentioning his birth or death. It's almost as if you were terrified of something? Or are you just stupid.
Evidence of anything that happened 2000 years ago is speculative at best. But I certainly do NOT believe the bible is the 'word of God'. There are far too many inconsistencies and contradictions.
Well I haven't bothered to read the big ass book myself either, and it's hard to remember every detail from a thousand page book. Also do remember that modern publishers can easily change certain parts of the bible.
I am too stupid to understand any of that, sorry.
Terrified? Of what? A unemployed hippie jew that wore sandals, and bummed food off people? Sounds like half of Marin County.
As for 'stupid', you just showed me your portfolio of reason is empty.
Also forgive me for calling you stupid. Perhaps that statement was a bit too harsh.
That's very White of you
Just tell me why didn't you finish the sentence, and left it off at a ellipsis.
Also I don't really care about the story of jesus either because I know it's just feel good shit for goys too.
Also, since when have I called myself the "portfolio of reason"?
(post is archived)