Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

I hate this type of counter-argument,always hated it. Can't remember if it's among the logical fallacies or not, but I always hated it. Because you dislike something,and even have factual proof against something, the entire argument,the debate is shut down because "don't like it, don't use it" or "don't like it,make your own".

This can be used both against the left and the right, and while there are cases where you CAN actually use this in an argument, the occasions for it are extremely specific and quite rare.

[–] • 6 pts

Its just another way of saying go fuck yourself.

Like when some smarmy kid does something he knows is fucked then just gives you a shit eating grin like what are you gonna do about it.

[–] • 2 pts

You deleted your comment before I got to reply.

I know what you mean man.

[–] • 1 pt

I saw it was too long, did not want to write an entire manifesto here or some shit, did not know if it's the place for it or not,so I decided to delete it. But yeah,those are the types of arguments I had.....

[–] • 0 pt

This same argument is used to defend banning people from individual subs on this site as well.

How come thats even still tolerated?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Yeah, "they are a private company that can do what they want".

It's another way of saying "shut up and stop complaining".

[–] • 0 pt

I once asked a smart ass where the other twitter location was at, if there was one in area like there are with bakeries.

[–] • 0 pt

It's called the 'Fediverse' there's plenty of free speech instances one of which is literally 'free speech extremist'.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The government is just another corporation with monopolies on our lives and they'll stamp out their competitors with force if necessary. The great war against drugs anyone?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Nice, Stonetoss is based against lolberts.

"Just build your own universe, bro!"

  • The logical conclusion of every lolbert argument.
[–] • 2 pts

I was a staunch libertarian for over 20 years. I had never heard the term lolbert. You taught me a word tonight.

[–] • 2 pts

Its the truncated form of lolbertarian.

I started down the libertarian path myself as a teen living in the Chicago-land area. And I realized early on in G.W. Bush years, that road eventually comes to an ideological fork.

[–] • 2 pts

You figured it out a lot faster than I did. It wasn't until coming to Voat that I realized that the philosophies I espoused could only function in an ethnically and morally homogenous society.

I spent the Bush years organizing 9/11 truth protests and feeding low grade redpills to the hungry.

[+] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] • 1 pt

I know I'm doing something right when I relate this out loud to my wife and she replies, "your terms are acceptable."

[–] • 1 pt

Sounds like you married a good woman. Congrats and happy new year to the both of you.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

most importantly... form your own militia.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I wish there SMART people were an economic sector/segment with MORE gravitas. Capitalism will get TRASHED (Eventually) with all of this pandering to the LOWEST common denominator (the BRAINLESS) bullshit. I can see it, but STUPID people can't and GREEDY people just care about MONEY and NOW.

[–] • 0 pt

Wish in one hand spit in the other. See which one fills up first.

Happy New Year Bear

[–] • 1 pt

This is like the argument monopolies use to justify their existence being unchallenged, as they continue crush their competition.