Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

610

So if you spend any time paying attention to the (((media))) they beat the dead horse of "we support our police." So somehow the dialectic is set up to get cuckservatives to support the police when in reality government doesn't have their best interests at heart. So the opposite side of the dialectic is to "de-fund the police." We all know that government isn't gonna just defund police and cut the taxpayer a refund check, they will divert the tax dollars to jobs for niggers and other nigger programs. Money will also be spent on a new breed of police, "counselors" that interview and intervene in situations the police used to. We can assume these counselor type will be thought police that tip off the regular police to anyone who might be "radicalizing" and they will ignore nigger crimes.

So on one side you have the "support the police" dialectic which serves the state, and the other side of the dialectic is the "defund the police" dialectic which also serves the state. The State wins either way and both libtards and cuckservatives swallow it hook line and sinker.

So if you spend any time paying attention to the (((media))) they beat the dead horse of "we support our police." So somehow the dialectic is set up to get cuckservatives to support the police when in reality government doesn't have their best interests at heart. So the opposite side of the dialectic is to "de-fund the police." We all know that government isn't gonna just defund police and cut the taxpayer a refund check, they will divert the tax dollars to jobs for niggers and other nigger programs. Money will also be spent on a new breed of police, "counselors" that interview and intervene in situations the police used to. We can assume these counselor type will be thought police that tip off the regular police to anyone who might be "radicalizing" and they will ignore nigger crimes. So on one side you have the "support the police" dialectic which serves the state, and the other side of the dialectic is the "defund the police" dialectic which also serves the state. The State wins either way and both libtards and cuckservatives swallow it hook line and sinker.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Boot licking Christ cuck sheeple tongue cop anus 24/7

LEA are not your friends

They're the enforcement arm of the elites

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Cops are the mailed fist of ZOG and its first line of defense. Who is it that has been enforcing the lockdown orders that have destroyed the middle class? Who is it that asks "Can I see your concealed weapons permit?" The legal code enforcement agencies are the enemy of the Constitution.

I want to defund the police and re-establish elected county sheriffs as officers of the Constitution with the ability to deputize citizens as needed. I have zero use for the current system of state/municipal police and also have zero use for the proposed Bolshevik "community police".

[–] • 1 pt

Not necessarily. Your post seems biased and in support of defunding the police.

Defunding the police means that there is room for policing on a federal level as states lose control of police ability. I mean, while we know election fraud occurs and many times there aren't good candidates, at least sheriffs are voted in by us.

Push for reform in your area if you feel that the police there are bad, but would advise against defunding which will lead to federal policing.

[–] • 1 pt

The Sheriff's department out here seems competent enough but the city cops are lazy and crooked. That might be because the Sheriff is accountable to the voter.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah. Good point. Usually, the sheriffs are much cooler than the police in my area as well. I'm not sure on corruption, but they are certainly more chill and competent.

Maybe, they should defund city cops and put that money into sheriffs dept. I'd support that type of movement.