Despite the obvious strawman, of course I’m not. A baker has a right to refuse service to anyone.
The fact also remains that if the baker had just kicked them out and never told them why, as is also his right, none of that shit would’ve ever happened
Nope, not a strawman, its a test for shitheel hypocrites which the left is full of.
The fact also remains that if the baker had just kicked them out and never told them why, as is also his right, none of that shit would’ve ever happened
annnnnd you almost had it, you were this close.
Now without qualifying it or hedging, do you or dont you support his right to turn down anyone and everyone for any reason.
Either all property is private property, or private and public-accessible property are distinct.
I literally said that I do support it, you fucking illiterate retard.
The fact that I do support it doesn’t change the fact that it wouldn’t have happened if he had done it differently.
I support the right to drive as fast as you want as long as it’s done safely, that doesn’t mean that I’m wrong if I said “if you didn’t speed, you wouldn’t have gotten a ticket.”
Nope, not a strawman, its a test for shitheel hypocrites which the left is full of.
Annnnd that’s the literal definition of a strawman. You’re attempting to distract from the fact that you were wrong about the original topic by arguing something completely different. Even if I WAS a hypocrite, it has no bearing on the fact that a business owner can kick you out if they want. Strawman. You’re just flat out wrong about everything.
(post is archived)