I have a disabled daughter.
We haven’t (and realistically could not) give her prompts for either gender.
She’s the most girly-girl I’ve ever even imagined. Loves all the “girl” stuff (dollies, clothes, beauty products, mirrors) and wants nothing whatever to do with any “boy” stuff.
Absolutely proves, beyond doubt, that gender is a real genetic thing. Absolutely not societal. She made her own choice entirely.
My 4 year old niece was trying to get her 1.5 year old brother to play with her Barbies. He just kept driving his trucks all over the barbie stuff.
She's too underdeveloped to make her own choices, which is why you have to tell them what their biological gender is and what decisions they should be making.
She’s so underdeveloped that we literally can not tell her what her biological gender is or why it would even matter.
But ever since she could even look around, take her down the toy aisles at the store and she gravitates toward the ‘girl’ stuff.
Underdeveloped and all, she knows what she is.
I played with trucks and did boy things as a little girl because I wanted to play with my older brothers and they didn't like to play with dolls. But guess what I grew out of it as I got older. It's no longer normal for a girl to play with boy toys or a boy to girl toys in order to have fun with their peers without them being told no you're trans. I am so glad I grew up before this entitled, speshel, victim generation.
Yeah same here. I still generally enjoy "boy" things more but that doesn't mean I want chop my tits off. I'm eternally grateful to have been raised by sane parents.
Is this shit for real? Your daughter is female because she gravitates towards girl toys?
So by the same logic, if you take a young disabled boy to the toy store and he gravitates towards girl toys, does that make him female too?
Your daughter is female because her genetic make up defines it. It has jack shit to do with what toys she gravitates to in the store.
What? No. How could you even read what I wrote and interpret it as such?
My daughter is biologically female and gravitates toward "girl" toys. And because she's disabled, there's no way anything could have any influence on her. It's perfect proof that genetics and biology define behavior.
So what if you had a little boy who gravitates to the same toys?
Hey retard, it's anecdotal evidence that genetic make-up defines behavior.
Hey retard
Sorry, socksoncats
Hey retard. It’s a completely illogical way to define gender. And your anecdote can be used to justify all the illogical behavior by parents who want to change the sex of their kid because of the toys they like.
Sorry, hey retard.
(post is archived)