What? No. How could you even read what I wrote and interpret it as such?
My daughter is biologically female and gravitates toward "girl" toys. And because she's disabled, there's no way anything could have any influence on her. It's perfect proof that genetics and biology define behavior.
So what if you had a little boy who gravitates to the same toys?
Honestly, I'm not sure. I think I'd see if I could encourage 'boy' type toys, but a lot would depend on the boy's interest in them.
Do you have kids?
Your post says that your daughters choice in toys is what proves she’s female. I’m sorry but that makes no sense.
Toys do not confirm gender.
Maybe I’m reading what you wrote incorrectly but that’s how your last paragraph comes across.
We never told our child she’s female. But she likes girly toys. Her like of girly toys proves gender is genetic.
Therefore.
The type of toys a child likes is proof of gender.
Then he is a faggot, and should be given up for adoption
(post is archived)