WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

940

Yes, what...are you a flat earther? hahahaha hey guys look a flat earther
No, obviously not. You're not a globetard, are you?
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Tell me more about wormholes. Is there any evidence of them? (Besides math.)

[–] 0 pt

The problem with saying "besides math" is that I don't know the point where you're going to draw the line and say "that evidence is only math". We know that space and time are not constant, they are subject to the force of gravity. This is testable and there is evidence to prove this.

The reason why we think wormholes are real is rooted in math, but the math is based on evidence. The reason why there isn't evidence beyond that is because we either have to find a way to detect one that occurs naturally and then go find one, or we have to create one ourselves. It seems that it might be rare for it to occur as a natural phenomena in the universe, or at least it might be rare that one is big enough and lasts for a long enough period of time that it would be noticeable to us.

[–] 0 pt

Do you think wormholes have affected the plane in any way?

[–] 0 pt

As I understand it, we don't have enough information about them to say. It could be that they're extremely rare and only occur naturally in places with lots of chaotic gravitational forces, or they could be relatively common but imperceptively tiny and lasting for only very brief moments. Imagine if on the surface of stars, the gravitational fields occasionally crash together in such a way to create a wormhole that is big enough and lasts long enough to deposit a single hydrogen molecule at a random point in the galaxy. That would be considered relatively common when compared to the possibility that it would only happen in areas where two black holes are colliding or maybe where two stars are colliding. Our technology isn't good enough to detect that kind of stuff