WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Really they are trying to mask a brown problem. They don't want to point out the blacks and spics shoot each other at alarmingly high rates, where White Americans kill each other at about the same rate as White Europeans (lower than all but Asians).

They are afraid to look racists so, to be fair, they have to take White people's guns too.

[–] 1 pt

Nigger violence is simply masked by the media never reporting on it. And yes, they call you names for talking about the extremely high rate of it. Nobody is taking away guns from niggers, hell Obama armed thousands of taco niggers. They are only taking guns away from Whites. Law abiding, honest Whites. What we are seeing is called Anarcho-tyrrany. Where one subset of the population can live a murderous life of lawless without consequence. The rest of the population is disarmed and punished for the smallest infraction such as calling a nigger a nigger. Anarcho-tyrrany is the strategic environment for the White genocide of the West.

[–] 1 pt

Only inner city blacks need to have their arms removed

[–] 1 pt

False. Whites and blacks can not coexist in the same environment without White genocide taking place. When a European engages in beastiality with a black, the resulting spawn is not European. Historically, wherever two groups share the same place, race mixing occurs. 'Integration' is White Genocide. Therefore all blacks that have escaped their sub Saharan containment zone should be returned to their zoo or cease to exist.

... and niggers. An armed nigger is loose canon. When niggers get guns, innocent people die because...niggers.

[–] 2 pts

Yes. They use niggers to kill if they are already in place like Rodesia or South Africa. Sometimes they will simply starve millions of Whites like in Holodomer.