I wonder how they measure IQ's below 70. They have to get like all questions wrong.
Raven's Matrices are an excellent means of approximating G by measuring IQ. It uses pattern matching and manipulation, which is useful cross-culturally because it doesn't require literacy, understanding a specific language, or familiarity with specific cultural knowledge. E.g. a college entrance exam in the West might estimate your IQ by asking paragraph comprehension questions about a passage covering Julius Caesar crossing the Rubicon. This would be appropriate when comparing you to other Westerners, but it'd be useless for comparing you to people who're illiterate, dont speak English, and have never heard of the Rubicon River. Raven's Matrices works equally well for any demographic and is the gold standard for these types of international comparisons.
I don't even think they use IQ tests to measure things at that point, I think they just observe them and judge their IQ based on how handicapped they are, the only groups which score under 70 on IQ tests are Pygmies, Khoisan and Aboriginal Australians though.
I now remember one of such tests in South Africa. They tested nigger college students (the brightest niggers) and they scored like 90. Since they are like the top 10% of the population, they fitted the bell curve to that number and got the average of 75 or something like that.
Top 10%? Try top 2%.
Yeah it's crazy to think they even made it through college with such low IQ's but I suppose the standards in Apefrica are low as fuck.
(post is archived)