The ventilators were/are actually killing people. And plenty of them had to know that. Last I looked up the numbers, the ventilator protocol had a 95%+ mortality rate for a disease that has a 99%+ survival rate. Yes, yes, there is a bias because only the most sick x% got put on ventilators. It's still far too high to explain that away. Even completely untreated, and even in the most vulnerable population segments, survival is 75%+. There are even several cases of people recovering after being taken off the ventilators as lost causes. The reason is simple: The most acute form the the disease disrupts the lungs' ability to absorb oxygen. That's why they start "feeling out of breath" in spite of sitting still. Their body instinctively wants to breathe faster to make up for the inefficiency and raise O2 levels again. Lungs temporarily not working so well? No problem... let's breathe faster. What do the "experts" do to "help" them? They give them a powerful sedative that knocks them out and paralyzes their lungs, and then put them on a machine that forces them to breath **at a normal, slow rate**. What happens when you force inefficient lungs to breathe slowly? Surprise, surprise, O2 levels crash, organs shut down from oxygen deprivation, and the patients all die. And the hospital gets a $41,000 USD paycheck per body bag, courtesy of your taxbux. Queue dance party. They should have been putting them on HiFlo oxygen. That's what you do when someone has low O2. You give them oxygen. Ventilators are for people with nerve damage or muscle degeneration or some other condition that physically prevents them from breathing. They do nothing for someone who's breathing fine but whose lungs aren't working well. This also explains why third world nations have better survival rates; they just didn't have the ventilators to put people on.