![This is how jews argue. This is called pilpul. Moving the goal posts then crying out in pain when caught. [1079x824 - 36KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/haSbcn.png){kind=link}
I did adress your screenshot. Then you called me jewish. Which blew any credibility you might have had in the debate.
You say you are calling out “jewishness”— what you mean is dishonesty, sophistry in argumentation. Manipulation by use of fallacies. They are good at it.
But that is exactly what you and anticlutch have done here. You hurl ad hominems at anyone who disagrees, and anyone who objects to your irrational dishonest arguments gets called a jew too.
This is not honest debate between intelligent logical honest europeans. Your strategy pisses on decent rhetoric. It is childish and ugly and you embarrass yourselves and all of us.
You have branded yourself a liar and manipulator in my book. You couldn’t debate me on the merits. You went to the big “J” argument. You are probably a child (<25) but if not there’s probably no hope of you ever developing any moral fiber as a debater. You argue like a weasel.
>I did adress your screenshot.
You stated that the names were different, and purposely and deliberately avoiding addressing that they are nearly identical and type the exact same things in the exact same way.
>Then you called me jewish.
I implied that you're probably Jewish. You did the rest.
>Which blew any credibility you might have had in the debate.
Attacking the messenger instead of the message. That's a very popular Jewish tactic, isn't it?
>You say you are calling out “jewishness”
I never once used the word "jewishness". Lying is another very popular Jewish tactic, isn't it? This time you even put in the quotes in a failed attempt to make it seem legitimate. You sure do put a lot of effort into your lying.
>Manipulation by use of fallacies. They are good at it.
I wouldn't say they're good at that. Well, if you know what you're looking for. I've pointed it out multiple times today. I'm even pointing it out a few times in this comment here.
>You hurl ad hominems at anyone who disagrees
Seems to me all I've done is posted a sceenshot, and then defended that screenshot against others who use dishonesty, sophistry in argumentation, manipulation by use of fallacies, and who hurl ad hominems at anyone who disagrees.
>This is not honest debate
Nope. It's not a debate. There is no debate. There is no argument. OP posted a screenshot. I comment a screenshot of someone with a nearly identical name, who types the exact same way, who flat out admitted they are a crypto Jew. There's no debate.
>Your strategy pisses on decent rhetoric. It is childish and ugly and you embarrass yourselves and all of us.
So... when are you going to discredit the screenshots? Or are you going to continue your failed attempts at attacking the messenger?
>You have branded yourself a liar and manipulator in my book.
In your book? Oh, no..... Not in your book.
>You couldn’t debate me on the merits.
It's not a debate. I presented evidence, and you can't discredit it.
>You went to the big “J” argument.
There is no argument. A nearly identical username, that types the exact same way, openly admitted they were a crpto Jew.
>You are probably a child (<25)
How's that Jewish tactic of attacking the messenger going? Not very well, is it? It doesn't work at all here, does it? Instead it just lends more credibility to everything I'm saying.
>You argue like a weasel.
It's not an argument, attacking the messenger..... I'm starting to get tired of repeating myself. But I'll do it once more, just for you. Because I know you like it so much.
(post is archived)