Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

102

There are quite a lot of accounts that do this. The problem being: this isn't a spoken conversation. Words aren't lost in the ether. They're sitting on a hard drive in @PMYB2's mom's house.

e: And the JIDF swung into this thread quickly to circle-jerk that I was being mean or antagonizing or some such retardation. Apparently calling someone out on their moving the goal posts is antagonizing.

There are quite a lot of accounts that do this. The problem being: this isn't a spoken conversation. Words aren't lost in the ether. They're sitting on a hard drive in @PMYB2's mom's house. e: And the JIDF swung into this thread quickly to circle-jerk that I was being mean or antagonizing or some such retardation. Apparently calling someone out on their moving the goal posts is antagonizing.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (237).
[–] • 1 pt

they can refuse a sale for any lawful reason.

To which I wouldn't have disagreed and pointed to the federal law that wearing a mask can not be stipulated for service.

Wait... What do we have here (i.ibb.co) seems I did that. And that faggot is the one who kvetched about.

Either way some others are right. Once you start calling people kikes and other names, you're not really engaging in a productive conversation. But yeah what you've shown is goalpost shifting. Just not intentional in my opinion.

I don't give a fuck. This is the internet. If you can't take being called a kike, a nigger, a faggot etc. Then leave.

[–] • 0 pt

I did a quick google search and got kike media articles saying its tantamount to the no shirt no shoes no service policies. I couldn't find the federal law you referenced. Care to tell me what law so I can look it up by name? Im genuinely curious about that and less so about who is a kike and who isnt

[–] • 0 pt

jewgle search

That's disgusting.

It's in the ADA. I refuse to believe you're being honest here. It's been posted about CONSTANTLY since early summer. Some posts incorrectly claim HIPAA has any say in the matter, which it doesn't. But it's so regularly posted EVERYWHERE from kikebook to plebbit that I can not believe for a moment you're unaware.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh I thought you were referencing something that specifically addressed masks. The ADA makes sense, but the government is essentially telling these businesses to turn people away for not wearing a mask via illegal mandates. Why would the courts then punish businesses for following the illegal mandates?

The whole situation is completely fucked, but jewing some local business about the ADA while they're trying to appease tyrannical state and city officials doesnt seem productive. The family owned restaurant up the road from me doesnt want to make me wear a mask - they just want to fucking stay in business.

So to your central point about businesses requiring masks...I'd say we have to take that fight to governors and mayors. And we know how that's going...