WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

There's something odd in all this, something odd I can only feel

For instance, why would you want to reset "all the thing" when you have power? It's not because things come your way... It's rather the opposite

They aren't trying to have power, they have it since a fucking while now, well consolidated, well entrenched

So?

And they are sloppy, they barely try to hide anymore, as if they could no longer afford it. And it's counter productive in the end. You and I for a start aren't even supposed to have this conversation, we aren't supposed to have noticed a tenth of what's unfolding

See, it feels almost as if they were way off timing and now they are rushing for the exit

We had trump that wasn't supposed to happen (or maybe that's what we're supposed to believe), but brexit was definitely not supposed to happen

....

All those plans, dating back to decades ago. They've been thought by generations of rather old men and think tanks, who were from the old television era, such as brzezinski and kissinger. Take georges soros also, or schwab to some extent

[–] 1 pt (edited )

The best laid plans of mice and men.

My guess is the internet. It exploded, from almost unheard of to vital within the span of about 30-40 years.

[–] 1 pt

I remember not so long ago when politicians were barely aware of what torrents were, and struggled to handle emails, let alone manage social media accounts

Some 10 years ago or so

What do you mean by "The best laid plans of mice and men."? It's a cartoon or a book reference right?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

What do you mean by "The best laid plans of mice and men."? It's a cartoon or a book reference right?

I'm pretty sure Captain American said it in a le epic quip to Tony Stark in the newest Goyvengers.

(it's an old scottish idiom, from a poem)

[–] 0 pt

I think they're pushing for collapses to coalesce. A one world government is easier for them to run.

[–] 0 pt

That's a very risky option, compared to the more desirable alternative of incremental implementation as they have done over the years

[–] 1 pt

True, but they also need something drastic to take that last step I think. People won't accept it without.