Get a spine and ask which law.
The executive branch can't legislate. These (((executive orders))) are not laws and have no sway over the police and their actions.
Separation of power is a fucking thing. Go back to 6th grade civics class.
Get a spine and ask which law.
If a drug gang threatened to destroy a shop if the owner didn't follow an arbitrary rule "no customers wearing blue" it wouldn't matter if there is no official legally installed law, the thugs' rule become the law of the land. The shop owner cares about reducing his personal financial risk and liabilities. Turning away the occasional customer to keep the gang happy seems to be the path of least resistance and the best choice for risk mitigation.
But big pharma isn't a drug gang, no way.
No. That's extortion and that's illegal. Per the criminal code. Enacted by the legislative branch. Not per a jewish overreach through nonbinding executive overreach.
Learn the law before you speak faggot.
extortion, illegal, overreach
You're not wrong, but laws without enforcement are useless. If you were a store owner that had a gang laying down rules through coercion, illegally, etc. If the police do nothing to protect you (apply law and order), you're probably going to consider the gang's demands. It's no different for mask mandates and everything else. If no one is willing to enforce law and order, everyone is at the mercy of the gangs. Everyone can cry about things not being legal, but until law and order is enforced nothing changes.
Technically the legal element in the video is trespassing after being instructed to leave. Even if there isn't a law for "no shoes, no shirt, no service" a business still has some power to expel shoppers (and then call law enforcement services to ensure they leave if they refuse). Is it right? Is it just? Denial of service has been a hot topic since at least that gay cake request at a Christian bakery.
Small businesses that don't comply (or likely wouldn't comply) with the gang demanding "no customer wear blue" are choked out and destroyed. While compliant, complicit business eject customers at the whim of their gang masters, with the legal authority to eject customers. And with the understanding that if they don't toe the line they will end up the same as the rest of the closed businesses. No legal requirement for the arbitrary rule, but the business makes it a condition of service, with the legal requirement for the shopper to leave when instructed.
This is what seems to be the situation. I can't say I see a bright future ahead on this.
Ha, you think stuff like that is taught in public schools. I remember having a class about the government (high school) that didn't even have a copy of the Bill of rights in it, just a bullshit summary. Also most teachers are degenerates and don't give a fuck.
You can always tell the newbie-patriots by their complete lack of awareness regarding the emergency powers act. There's been no 'rule of law' that you and @JewsRbadNews seem to insist since. Hint: it's been a long time since the US has /not/ technically been in a state of emergency. This is intentional of course. They love hearing ignorants whinging about their constitution, as it signals how few have even figured out the constitution is nothing more than a strongly worded letter that they can choose to cite only when they wish.
Disappointingly naive.
patriots
Stop.
There's been no 'rule of law' that you and @JewsRbadNews seem to insist since.
Where am I insisting that? I'm stating the precise opposite. "executive orders are not laws"
I get it. You're a quck. But fuck off and go to (((ruqqus)))
Umm... I'm not sure how to address your confusion. So you're agreeing that the mandates are enforceable? Otherwise, take your confusion elsewhere.
I'll fuck only what and where I like, so fuck you, buddy.
Unenlightened knuckle dragger.
The correct answer is that "I am an employee for <whatever> and being a private business they can require masks regardless of law."
Not according to federal law.
As obnoxious as people who aren't disabled using the ADA for their benefit is, the kikery of masks is far more of a cost than such a consideration.
My city has an ordinance which is a law. It sucks but then again I generally don't go into places now as I'm more worried about dealing with faggotry then conspiracies.
ordinance law
No. No it's not. That isn't how law works.
A government executive branch member can't mandate things to the populace. He can mandate things to government employees certainly. But only the legislature can... LEGISLATE LAW.
I don't fucking understand hwo this is confusing.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/ordinance
If there is a Town or City Ordinance then must people conflate it to being a law. If there isn't then the legislative branch of a state or Country applies.
That's not how private corporations work, they can refuse a sale to anyone for any reason. They even hang a sign up to remind you.
Okay Moshe.
Buy a business and refuse to sell to someone due to them being a nigger.
See how that works out.
You're wrong with ever letter you wrote and it's astounding. It's already a federal law that's decades old which denies private businesses the ability to deny business due to mask wearing.
Discrimination due to race and a mask is not the same thing and if you think normie's will see it that way you're smoking crack
(post is archived)