![too bad most are too stupid to notice [1024x589 - 67KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/pOjvjy.jpg){kind=link}
Using the word WOMEN is all encompassing, it is used to indicate ALL FEMALES.
Wrong.
When someone says "cats have 4 paws", they are fully aware that some cats have lost a paw in an accident or were born with a birth defect.
That is the nature of generalizations.
Simirlarly, speaking about "women", is a generalization. Everyone is aware that every generalization entails exceptions.
Well, maybe everyone but you.
Cats have 4 paws. FACT.
Deformed/mutant/unlucky cats who have less than that, doesn’t change the fact that felines have 4 paws.
If you accept, nay defend, poor and lazy communication, that’s your problem. I’m specific. I say exactly what I mean. On here, in real life and everywhere else.
But go ahead and promote mediocrity, and I’ll go ahead and call you a try hard twink!
doesn’t change the fact that felines have 4 paws.
But not ALL felines have 4 paws.
Same with saying that women are shorter than men.
On average, they are half a head shorter. But not ALL women are shorter than ALL men.
I’m specific. I say exactly what I mean.
I bet you don't give a shit about generalizations unless they are about women.
If I search ‘feline physiology’, guess how many paws cats HAVE??
Nah, I’m not for any generalisations, they are weak. Modifiers add clarity to communication. Unless you prefer to be a trog!
(post is archived)