![too bad most are too stupid to notice [1024x589 - 67KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/pOjvjy.jpg){kind=link}
Also, in rare cases it's possible for a woman to be born without their lower body or vagina.
https://www.livescience.com/60162-born-without-vagina-mrkh-syndrome.html
"Moats was diagnosed with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, a condition that affects about 1 in every 4,500 newborn girls, according to the National Institutes of Health. It happens when, during embryonic development, the female reproductive organs (including the uterus, cervix and vagina) do not develop properly. As a result, the uterus and vagina may be underdeveloped or absent entirely, the NIH said."
We can still infer that they are women because of chromosomes, tits etc.
Almost everything is a generalization, because there will always be exceptions
Was more going along the lines of if a dude decides he wants to ‘identify as a woman’, is he then a woman? Not to me!!
I’ll rephrase it - in admiration of your tenacious defence of poorly worded communication lol
“Women have two X chromosomes.”
How can you mangle this to fit your determination that ‘women’ does not refer to a generalisation of ALL women?
Even if you can find one or two sentences that refer to ALL.
Most sentences do not.
As I have proven with some women being, indeed, born without a vagina.
And sidenote, you never said "MOST" women are born with a vagina. You too, made a generalization. Without even realizing it.
Poor communication skills on your side.
Nope, women are born with vaginas. Women born without a vagina are abnormal or genetically defective, they are not the NORM. So it’s absolutely correct to say women are born with vaginas. That’s how they know it’s a girl infant at birth. If the infant has no vagina and no penis, then they have to find out what it is before declaring the gender.
WOMEN ARE BORN WITH VAGINAS.
How much of a faggot are you though?!
(post is archived)