![too bad most are too stupid to notice [1024x589 - 67KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/pOjvjy.jpg){kind=link}
Cats have 4 paws. FACT.
Deformed/mutant/unlucky cats who have less than that, doesn’t change the fact that felines have 4 paws.
If you accept, nay defend, poor and lazy communication, that’s your problem. I’m specific. I say exactly what I mean. On here, in real life and everywhere else.
But go ahead and promote mediocrity, and I’ll go ahead and call you a try hard twink!
doesn’t change the fact that felines have 4 paws.
But not ALL felines have 4 paws.
Same with saying that women are shorter than men.
On average, they are half a head shorter. But not ALL women are shorter than ALL men.
I’m specific. I say exactly what I mean.
I bet you don't give a shit about generalizations unless they are about women.
If I search ‘feline physiology’, guess how many paws cats HAVE??
Nah, I’m not for any generalisations, they are weak. Modifiers add clarity to communication. Unless you prefer to be a trog!
If I search ‘feline physiology’, guess how many paws cats HAVE??
If a feline loses a paw or had a birth defect, does it cease to be feline?
Modifiers add clarity to communication.
No, it only clogs everything up. To make things easier, we assume "most" to be default.
Consider that "ALL" is also a modifier. The statements "Women are a head shorter than men" and "All Women are always a head shorter than men" are different.
You are wrong for assuming that "all" is the default modifier.
Even in encyclopedias and medical anatomy, "usually" or "most" is the presumed default. Not "all" and "always".
I’m not for any generalisations
You never make generalizations about media, white men, atheists, kikes, blacks etc.? Are you certain?
(post is archived)