WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

374

I tried listening to him for a little bit, but dear lord is he annoying, and I can't get past a minute of the guy.

Is he the type who just immediately declares that "I won the debate"/"made this guy butthurt"/"absolutely destroyed X" regardless of what transpired in a discussion? Because in my limited few minutes of exposure so far, that seems to be the case.

Is there anything important I should know about this guy to understand another side better, or is this all a waste of time?

I tried listening to him for a little bit, but dear lord is he annoying, and I can't get past a minute of the guy. Is he the type who just immediately declares that "I won the debate"/"made this guy butthurt"/"absolutely destroyed X" regardless of what transpired in a discussion? Because in my limited few minutes of exposure so far, that seems to be the case. Is there anything important I should know about this guy to understand another side better, or is this all a waste of time?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

hes one of those faggots that constantly argues over semantics. its fucking taxing to listen too because hes not sitting close enough to brain with a glass ashtray.