WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

974

I'll try to find my posts on the searchvoat archive for proof but I don't know if I'll find my old posts. But know that I predicted Voats fate almost exactly years in advanced. My account there was the same as here and I also used a previous account under "truthwoke33". Puttitout blocked me and was afraid to answer any single question I had even when other users backed me up. I knew what Voat was. It was a corral, a holding pen for bad goys and more importantly, a way to seed dissent and feelings of being isolated and alone. Many believe this was just the natural consequence of a forum stocked with loners and outcast individuals, but I believe that it was also by design from the administration.

After the Voat canary on twitter died, that's when the site was assumed compromised. The people running the puttitout account never addressed the canary. That was the first flag. And make no mistake, the "person" you thought was puttitout was a collection of individuals assigned to monitor and surveil individuals who the Jew government may consider potential "radicals" or outlier who could become a "problem" for their agenda. I know I'm mostly speaking hearsay to many here's interpretation of the events, so I understand if my notions are dismissed but I swear I have an acute ability to notice a person's speech patterns through their typing and sentence structure (there is a scientific field dedicated to the study of this as well) and I can say with as much certainty that an anonymous online poster can that Voat had individuals planted to be "influencers". If you can recall, this was part of what the Voat team was referring to as "builders" (or what you might call a paid shill whore with no soul).

I also believe that it was a corral for the Q followers. They even got their own little badges. How cute. The Voat admin team allowed the site to become a honey pot and essentially a cult for the Q users. Their forum was kept anonymous for a number of reasons but in truth it was because it makes it impossible to know a shill from a legitimate user. Posting history matters people, you'd be surprised at what you can realize about a person once you start equivocating the physical action nessecary to complete a digital task. E.g. if someone on Voat posts a new thread literally every hour on the hour 24/7 it could be reasonably assumed that the account is: someone with a chronic sleep disorder; a bot posting links automatically; multiple users logging into the same account. There's many possibilities but the point is a human had to take a physical real world action to cause these possibilities to occur. This is a example of how I was analyzing posts and accounts to determine if someone was communicating in good faith.

I worry I will discover the same type of influences here on poal and that the same degradation will lead to Poals downfall.

I know I'm just the newfag here, I know I have made many unsubstantiated statements. I'm sorry I don't have anything more rock solid to show at this exact moment but I needed to express this to the forum I want to stick around in before it slips from my mind and I lose the cogency I kept here. Please, I'm literally begging you, if I start ringing the shill bells again please I'm begging you to at least give me a chance to explain.

I'm tired of watching everything I love and care about die. I'm just, I'm just so tired of it.

I'll try to find my posts on the searchvoat archive for proof but I don't know if I'll find my old posts. But know that I predicted Voats fate almost exactly years in advanced. My account there was the same as here and I also used a previous account under "truthwoke33". Puttitout blocked me and was afraid to answer any single question I had even when other users backed me up. I knew what Voat was. It was a corral, a holding pen for bad goys and more importantly, a way to seed dissent and feelings of being isolated and alone. Many believe this was just the natural consequence of a forum stocked with loners and outcast individuals, but I believe that it was also by design from the administration. After the Voat canary on twitter died, that's when the site was assumed compromised. The people running the puttitout account never addressed the canary. That was the first flag. And make no mistake, the "person" you thought was puttitout was a collection of individuals assigned to monitor and surveil individuals who the Jew government may consider potential "radicals" or outlier who could become a "problem" for their agenda. I know I'm mostly speaking hearsay to many here's interpretation of the events, so I understand if my notions are dismissed but I swear I have an acute ability to notice a person's speech patterns through their typing and sentence structure (there is a scientific field dedicated to the study of this as well) and I can say with as much certainty that an anonymous online poster can that Voat had individuals planted to be "influencers". If you can recall, this was part of what the Voat team was referring to as "builders" (or what you might call a paid shill whore with no soul). I also believe that it was a corral for the Q followers. They even got their own little badges. How cute. The Voat admin team allowed the site to become a honey pot and essentially a cult for the Q users. Their forum was kept anonymous for a number of reasons but in truth it was because it makes it impossible to know a shill from a legitimate user. Posting history matters people, you'd be surprised at what you can realize about a person once you start equivocating the physical action nessecary to complete a digital task. E.g. if someone on Voat posts a new thread literally every hour on the hour 24/7 it could be reasonably assumed that the account is: someone with a chronic sleep disorder; a bot posting links automatically; multiple users logging into the same account. There's many possibilities but the point is a human had to take a physical real world action to cause these possibilities to occur. This is a example of how I was analyzing posts and accounts to determine if someone was communicating in good faith. I worry I will discover the same type of influences here on poal and that the same degradation will lead to Poals downfall. I know I'm just the newfag here, I know I have made many unsubstantiated statements. I'm sorry I don't have anything more rock solid to show at this exact moment but I needed to express this to the forum I want to stick around in before it slips from my mind and I lose the cogency I kept here. Please, I'm literally begging you, if I start ringing the shill bells again please I'm begging you to at least give me a chance to explain. I'm tired of watching everything I love and care about die. I'm just, I'm just so tired of it.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Poal is different.

Voat was always MeaNt to be sacrifIced.

[–] 1 pt

Voat had no viable revenue model.

Whenever proven solutions to this problem were put forth, they were pushed aside.

For whatever reason, they had no intention of remaining open.

The decision, legally, was theirs to make.

[–] 1 pt

I don't think there will be any website on the internet that isn't infiltrated considering that someone will always be willing to pay people to guide the narrative. This was obvious 30 years ago and even more so now.

I'm pretty sure everyone saw it coming. News about the sponsors, canary and the buyout came a year ago at least. I stopped posting on my sub there 2 years ago.

So where's you prediction for Poal? Since if you don't see the same thing coming for Poal, then you're full of shit. Poal will go the way of the dodo, just like Voat, and everyone here will act just as surprised and outraged... Then move on to another site to rinse-repeat. Simps. I expect Poal to be gone every time I visit. I'll put no great effort into this site.

[–] 0 pt

Voat had more shills than users in the past 6 months. It was still a good spot to find real news before any place else. But I found myself being really careful about what I posted.