He has the right to free movement under the constitution, it's not far from where he lives, he worked there, he was invited. How many reasons do you need? Your point of view is so weak it is laughable.
He has the right to free movement under the constitution, it's not far from where he lives, he worked there, he was invited. How many reasons do you need? Your point of view is so weak it is laughable.
Who deputized him to go keep order? Was he deputized? He had no authority to stop anyone from doing anything.
Who deputized him to go keep order? Was he deputized? He had no authority to stop anyone from doing anything.
the kike reveals themselves
the kike reveals themselves
He has the right to free movement, and the right to bare arms. He doesn't need to be deputised.You claim he does: provide proof of claim.
He has the right to free movement, and the right to bare arms. He doesn't need to be deputised.You claim he does: provide proof of claim.
Read the wisconsin laws. He's a nurderer. Enough said.
Read the wisconsin laws. He's a nurderer. Enough said.
(post is archived)