WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

962

One fundamental problem with the way in which people think is that they still view the world through the leftist framework in which morality is determined by consent and freedom, not a deeper, morality that can't be explained in such buzzwords.

Another problem is that they still use leftist buzzwords, like "wasism," when there is nothing wrong with racial prejudice and "wasism" presupposes there being something wrong with it (prejudice, not abusing other good race's of man). Another thing they misunderstand is that evil should never be tolerated, niggers (all "black" "people" /negroids are niggers) are evil not only (and not the source) because of their actions or because of their "culture" but because of the way in which they think, their racial collective unconscious (as extremely undeveloped and animalistic as it is) is evil, and thus niggers should be exterminated, while, for instance, not all East Asians should be (as they're not all evil and have a highly developed, albeit different, racial collective unconscious from us).

Another serious problem is that people in our movement (and White people in general) have been programmed to "put themselves" in the shoes of others outside of their race (which is impossible because you cannot view your own people as alien) which has led to people not having any real understanding of how non-Whites actually think or how the world really works. You can only understand an issue properly if you put yourself in a situation that you can understand. If you want to understand slavery for example, you cannot view it from a niggers perspective, but must craft a story in which Whites are enslaved by non-Whites (my go to is East Asians, as they are the most similar to Whites) and try and understand how you would react and feel in those circumstances and then imagine how you would react. Would you want to rape, cuck, murder and loot all the East Asians for having enslaved your ancestors hundreds of years ago? Would you want to be given unfair advantages over them for something their ancestors did? Would our people have even ever pushed for desegregation and race-mixing? If we had rebelled against them, would you have gone on to rape (no one deserves to be raped, period) and kill innocent (one can only control their own actions, no one is responsible for the actions of others) East Asian girls/women and children? Or would you have just killed those that raped and abused your people?

One fundamental problem with the way in which people think is that they still view the world through the leftist framework in which morality is determined by consent and freedom, not a deeper, morality that can't be explained in such buzzwords. Another problem is that they still use leftist buzzwords, like "wasism," when there is nothing wrong with racial prejudice and "wasism" presupposes there being something wrong with it (prejudice, not abusing other good race's of man). Another thing they misunderstand is that evil should never be tolerated, niggers (all "black" "people" /negroids are niggers) are evil not only (and not the source) because of their actions or because of their "culture" but because of the way in which they think, their racial collective unconscious (as extremely undeveloped and animalistic as it is) is evil, and thus niggers should be exterminated, while, for instance, not all East Asians should be (as they're not all evil and have a highly developed, albeit different, racial collective unconscious from us). Another serious problem is that people in our movement (and White people in general) have been programmed to "put themselves" in the shoes of others outside of their race (which is impossible because you cannot view your own people as alien) which has led to people not having any real understanding of how non-Whites actually think or how the world really works. You can only understand an issue properly if you put yourself in a situation that you can understand. If you want to understand slavery for example, you cannot view it from a niggers perspective, but must craft a story in which Whites are enslaved by non-Whites (my go to is East Asians, as they are the most similar to Whites) and try and understand how you would react and feel in those circumstances and then imagine how you would react. Would you want to rape, cuck, murder and loot all the East Asians for having enslaved your ancestors hundreds of years ago? Would you want to be given unfair advantages over them for something their ancestors did? Would our people have even ever pushed for desegregation and race-mixing? If we had rebelled against them, would you have gone on to rape (no one deserves to be raped, period) and kill innocent (one can only control their own actions, no one is responsible for the actions of others) East Asian girls/women and children? Or would you have just killed those that raped and abused your people?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I see you've shifted fully from "empathy" to "putting yourself in their shoes"

Have you never had a bad impulse? Can you say you've never had a bad thought? Can you say you are without sin?

Empathy does not mean putting up with bad behavior, it means being able to relate to it. Thats the big thing you keep missing.

You say they think differently. You say they only care about themselves. You dislike this. Is that, maybe, because in relation to yourself, they think differently? Can you not put yourself in their shoes and then think like they do? Can you not think about what you'd do if you only cared about yourself? Are you incapable of such a feat of mental acuity?

You call me a cuck, when you're a cuck to your hatred. Like I said, unbalanced people are easily manipulated. Rather than pointing your energy to the people causing this disharmony in the first place you're going right along with it.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

"I see you've shifted fully from "empathy" to "putting yourself in their shoes" " That is literally what empathy means. "Have you never had a bad impulse? Can you say you've never had a bad thought? Can you say you are without sin? " This isn't relevant because as I stated, we do not think the same as them at a fundamental level. "You call me a cuck, when you're a cuck to your hatred. Like I said, unbalanced people are easily manipulated. Rather than pointing your energy to the people causing this disharmony in the first place you're going right along with it." No, you are just a literal cuckold that doesn't understand anything I am saying, and if you don't hate niggers (all blacks are niggers) that want the things I already described (to cuck and destroy you and rape your women/children) then you are a cuck.

[–] 0 pt

Well I guess this is it. You don't really seem to be willing to actually have your views changed, which is what an honest discussion depends upon. As for myself, you haven't convinced me that you cannot use yourself as a reference to how other people act. All you've said is, in summary, "you can't because they're different".

Time comes when a conversation in no longer fruitful for either party.

Have a good one, I hope your path takes you where you want it to lead.

[–] 0 pt

Don't pretend you are any more willing to change your views than I am. And good day to you too (so long as you aren't a nigger/black, kikes, race-mixer or cuck)