It's all subjective. I do agree that women with excessive tatts are, in my eyes, less valuable. They don't seem to care about how they look or more importantly how they are perceived. The argument is for the empowered woman who decided to tatt her body up in coordination with an ideology. I'm being sarcastic, of course.
It's not empowerment, it's attention whoring and validation. The only ideology she's serving is modernism and feminism both of which are cancer.
Even if her tattoos, in the off-chance, do mean something, covering your assets in ink for a woman is like saying she's not comfortable in her own skin and can't exist without disfiguring her natural self.
Total turn off as far as a man looking for stability and family and a partner who can contribute.
The only way she can exist is if someone either validates her or exonerates. I agree. Someone desperate for attention doesn't know how to live without someone else.
(post is archived)