I'd have no shot at winning - I'd be talking about cutting government spending down to almost $0, and pushing for personal responsibility. That's assuming I don't get assassinated.
I don't see how removing .gov entirely overnight is going to improve anything, it's going to be anarchy all over the place, for a start
Who's going to run courts and police forces, let alone armed forces?
Private sector?
None of what I said would be able to be done overnight, the government didn't get to be the size that it is overnight. The courts wouldn't be going away. Why are police forces even needed? They are nothing more than enforcement for the elected officials that created and appointed them as well as spot tax enforcement. Today, police departments almost always part of the local politicians money laundering schemes via the unions. Armed forces would be heavily modified compared to how it is now.
You are being unreasonable with the assumption that we have to keep growing government or keeping it at its current size is sustainable. Constant and consistent growth is always unsustainable.
>Why are police forces even needed?
...
Are you fucking serious?
Who's going to pay for the investigation in a murder that left an entire family murdered in a gruesome way by an organ trafficking crew?
You?
Who is going to generously pay to go after those criminals in your private police and .gov free utopia?
>You are being unreasonable with the assumption that we have to keep growing government or keeping it at its current size is sustainable. Constant and consistent growth is always unsustainable.
I've never said that, that's made up shit
Quote me to prove I even remotely implied that, or simply stfu
(post is archived)