>You are being unreasonable with the assumption that we have to keep growing government or keeping it at its current size is sustainable. Constant and consistent growth is always unsustainable.
I've never said that, that's made up shit
Quote me to prove I even remotely implied that, or simply stfu
You are implying it with what you said - https://poal.co/c/6c8524b4-2fd9-4e1c-8254-bbdf94d432c9#cmnts.
You are, with the words you chose, for the current slow growth of government as it has been happening since FDR's New Deal.
>I don't see how removing .gov entirely overnight is going to improve anything, it's going to be anarchy all over the place, for a start Who's going to run courts and police forces, let alone armed forces? Private sector?
Reading comprehension much?
Where do I say an ever growing government is necessary or keeping it at its current size is sustainable?
I specifically ask you who's going to run courts and police forces if we do away with .gov
Nothing more
The rest is straight out of your imagination
I never said do away with government. I said it needs to be shrunk. I also point out that it would be impossible to do overnight.
(post is archived)