None of what I said would be able to be done overnight, the government didn't get to be the size that it is overnight. The courts wouldn't be going away. Why are police forces even needed? They are nothing more than enforcement for the elected officials that created and appointed them as well as spot tax enforcement. Today, police departments almost always part of the local politicians money laundering schemes via the unions. Armed forces would be heavily modified compared to how it is now.
You are being unreasonable with the assumption that we have to keep growing government or keeping it at its current size is sustainable. Constant and consistent growth is always unsustainable.
>Why are police forces even needed?
...
Are you fucking serious?
Who's going to pay for the investigation in a murder that left an entire family murdered in a gruesome way by an organ trafficking crew?
You?
Who is going to generously pay to go after those criminals in your private police and .gov free utopia?
Who's going to pay for the investigation in a murder that left an entire family murdered in a gruesome way by an organ trafficking crew?
No one, those investigations aren't happening now. If they do happen, it is so they get memory holed.
Who is going to generously pay to go after those criminals in your private police and .gov free utopia?
The sheriffs and their deputies. I never said anything about a government free utopia. I've merely said government shouldn't be as big as it is and growing.
>No one, those investigations aren't happening now. If they do happen, it is so they get memory holed.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/06/29/us/houston-arrests-human-smuggling/index.html
5 charged in human trafficking case after 18 immigrants are rescued in Houston
>The sheriffs and their deputies.
Part and parcel of .gov
>You are being unreasonable with the assumption that we have to keep growing government or keeping it at its current size is sustainable. Constant and consistent growth is always unsustainable.
I've never said that, that's made up shit
Quote me to prove I even remotely implied that, or simply stfu
You are implying it with what you said - https://poal.co/c/6c8524b4-2fd9-4e1c-8254-bbdf94d432c9#cmnts.
You are, with the words you chose, for the current slow growth of government as it has been happening since FDR's New Deal.
>I don't see how removing .gov entirely overnight is going to improve anything, it's going to be anarchy all over the place, for a start Who's going to run courts and police forces, let alone armed forces? Private sector?
Reading comprehension much?
Where do I say an ever growing government is necessary or keeping it at its current size is sustainable?
I specifically ask you who's going to run courts and police forces if we do away with .gov
Nothing more
The rest is straight out of your imagination
(post is archived)