Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

918

I can get behind no gods even though there is no better social binder than religion. But no masters is retarded. Even in a small survival group there will be an alpha male leading. Every group two and larger has a leader. The whole expression is stupid in every regard. Petulant children who have never put their sweat and blood into creating anything

I can get behind no gods even though there is no better social binder than religion. But no masters is retarded. Even in a small survival group there will be an alpha male leading. Every group two and larger has a leader. The whole expression is stupid in every regard. Petulant children who have never put their sweat and blood into creating anything

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Leader != master.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

A good master is still a master. It doesn't matter what title you apply to it. You are still being led.

[–] • 0 pt

If I'm climbing a mountain with a group, often there is just no room to go side-by-side, so one must go first. They are a leader, at least temporarily, but not a master. It doesn't mean they have authority, it just means they are going first and perhaps making it slightly easier on followers.

A master on the other hand would typically order everyone else to hew a path so they could be carried up on the least bumpy route.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Sure in that arbitrary scenario. In a civilization sense there will always be someone in charge or chaos. We are individualistic animals who form groups but not well. We need a leader/master/emperor whatever you want to call them.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

There will always be a leader. I'm not a fan of this fact. It however as far as I can tell is true.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

No man worth much wants to follow. Pure democracy fails. Most need to be led anyways.