WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

535

While browsing through I noticed links to articles on garbage tier [msm] websites that I have no interest on clicking but wanted to read. Posters on other platforms are encouraged to archive links, which; preserves the original content of the link and prevents the original source from getting click revenue. I'd like to see that here. Thoughts?

While browsing through I noticed links to articles on garbage tier [msm] websites that I have no interest on clicking but wanted to read. Posters on other platforms are encouraged to archive links, which; preserves the original content of the link and prevents the original source from getting click revenue. I'd like to see that here. Thoughts?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Example, I generally archive livescience.com because it has pop videos, plus ppl have complained ads on it drive them nuts on smartphones ... but if the main theme is a video, I can't, so I just run with video links and slideshows.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Thanks for archiving and your points on videos embedded in articles.