Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

There is the whole "Hitler hated the Slavs as much as the Jews!" thing going around. I was talking to some idiot and saying that the reason he disliked Slavs comes from them replacing Germans in Austria (Much like Mexicans do to Americans in the US), and that Slavs being of Aryan descent, were not shit-talked just because they were Slavic. They of course insist the mainstream narrative is legit (like all good NPCs). I have only read the Stalagg edition of Mein Kampf and the only "anti-Slavic" shit I saw was the disdain that Germans in Austria were being replaced by them. Nor have I seen any speeches where he shit-talks them ethnically. I have not however read a ton of other works.

I know arguing with NPCs is basically pointless, but it made me curious where this "He hated them as much as the Jews!" (something that was clearly not the case, any literature/speeches/etc. you look at the Jews are like x100 worse than the Slavs) thing came from. Said NPC claims they have read Mein Kampf in 3 languages, which I find highly suspect (If you find it that vile, and your mind is so closed you believe the MSM about everything, what's the point or rereading it? Your mind is obviously already made up.)

Any info with more info on Slavic question, and where this "as bad as the Jews!!!" sentiment comes from, is welcome.

There is the whole "Hitler hated the Slavs as much as the Jews!" thing going around. I was talking to some idiot and saying that the reason he disliked Slavs comes from them replacing Germans in Austria (Much like Mexicans do to Americans in the US), and that Slavs being of Aryan descent, were not shit-talked just because they were Slavic. They of course insist the mainstream narrative is legit (like all good NPCs). I have only read the Stalagg edition of Mein Kampf and the only "anti-Slavic" shit I saw was the disdain that Germans in Austria were being replaced by them. Nor have I seen any speeches where he shit-talks them ethnically. I have not however read a ton of other works. I know arguing with NPCs is basically pointless, but it made me curious where this "He hated them as much as the Jews!" (something that was clearly not the case, any literature/speeches/etc. you look at the Jews are like x100 worse than the Slavs) thing came from. Said NPC claims they have read Mein Kampf in 3 languages, which I find highly suspect (If you find it that vile, and your mind is so closed you believe the MSM about everything, what's the point or rereading it? Your mind is obviously already made up.) Any info with more info on Slavic question, and where this "as bad as the Jews!!!" sentiment comes from, is welcome.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

I found a copy of Mein Kampf . There are a few quotes pasted below and I recall him talking about the over ethnic mixing so there was no German majority and how it reduced the intellectual capabilities of Austria (because everyone was fighting and he didn't think much of Slavs).

I was convinced that even if it should sacrifice the German element the Danubian State could not continue to exist. Even at the price of a long and slow Slaviz-ation of the Austrian Germans the State would secure no guarantee of a really durable Empire; because it was very questionable if and how far the Slavs possessed the necessary capacity for constructive politics.

Here is another one:

Once the influence of the Germans in Austria had been wiped out, what then would be the value of the alliance? If the Triple Alliance were to be advantageous to Germany, was it not a necessary condition that the predominance of the German element in Austria should be maintained? Or did anyone really believe that Germany could continue to be the ally of a Habsburg Empire under the hegemony of the Slavs?

The official attitude of German diplomacy, as well as that of the general public towards internal problems affecting the Austrian nationalities was not merely stupid, it was insane. On the alliance, as on a solid foundation, they grounded the security and future existence of a nation of seventy millions, while at the same time they allowed their partner to continue his policy of undermining the sole foundation of that alliance methodically and resolutely, from year to year. A day must come when nothing but a formal contract with Viennese diplomats would be left. The alliance itself, as an effective support, would be lost to Germany.

And one that is quite revealing:

Even in Pan-German circles one heard the opinion expressed that the Austrian Germans might very well succeed in Germanizing the Austrian Slavs, if only the Government would be ready to co-operate. Those people did not understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings. What they mostly meant by Germanization was a process of forcing other people to speak the German language. But it is almost inconceivable how such a mistake could be made as to think that a Nigger or a Chinaman will become a German because he has learned the German language and is willing to speak German for the future, and even to cast his vote for a German political party. Our bourgeois nationalists could never clearly see that such a process of Germanization is in reality de-Germanization; for even if all the outstanding and visible differences between the various peoples could be bridged over and finally wiped out by the use of a common language, that would produce a process of bastardization which in this case would not signify Germanization but the annihilation of the German element. In the course of history it has happened only too often that a conquering race succeeded by external force in compelling the people whom they subjected to speak the tongue of the conqueror and that after a thousand years their language was spoken by another people and that thus the conqueror finally turned out to be the conquered.