Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

165

1) don't outshine the master

make those above you feel comfortably superior. in your desire to please and impress them, don't go too far in displaying your talents or you may achieve the opposite result you intended. you may inspire fear and insecurity. make your masters appear more brilliant than they are and you will attain the heights of power.

translation: be a toady and a yes man to your betters. this reads like an introduction course to renfields from a vampire. he uses the most fawning, disgusting examples to illustrate his points. the cautionary tale is Nicolas fouquet, louie the 14ths finance minister. he explains how he threw too big of a party and that upset the monarch, who felt upstaged. history says fouquet was another hedonistic thief. this guy asserts he just stole the bosses thunder and was punished for it. the reinforcement of the "law" is galileo. who flattered the medici's into a court appointment because he was tired of being a starving artist. sounds like modern academia is reading this book. manipulating science to their own ends for personal power and gain. I don't want to think this way about galileo. but...….its quite possibly true. this guy not only applauds it, but holds it up as an example of desireable behavior. I really, really detest this author.

he goes on to explain that using your developed or God-given talents inspires insecurity in others. with those beneath you, don't worry about it. but tread carefully around your betters. they'll pretend to like you, but will tear you down at the first opportunity. he says don't fool yourself into thinking that the world has changed since the days of feudalism. there are kings and queens among us and you shouldn't shine too brightly around them or they'll cut you down. his example is the 16th century prince astorre Manfredi. who's city was taken by Cesare Borgia. Borgia allowed him to stay in power, unmolested to keep the population peaceful. a few weeks later he arrested him on charges of conspiracy, locked him up, murdered him, and tossed him in the river. his crime was, reportedly, simply outshining Borgia by being himself. he didn't know his role, and got killed for it. another example of this is Japanese. in the 16th century an artist had a statue of himself made wearing sandals. this was a sign of nobility. the emperor was going to execute him for it, but he opted to kill himself. at the end he states this is exempted when your "master" is spiraling. go ahead and outshine him. if you play it right you can replace him.

my perspective and rebuttal: we are subservient only to god. if you are outshone in goodness, stand aside and let that person do all the good they can in the world. help them if you can. be humble and gracious. do your very best, all the time. if your "betters" don't like it and persecute you, shine even brighter. yes people have been killed for this, but they are also heroes whos voices echo throughout history as an inspiration to those who reject tyrants.

1) don't outshine the master make those above you feel comfortably superior. in your desire to please and impress them, don't go too far in displaying your talents or you may achieve the opposite result you intended. you may inspire fear and insecurity. make your masters appear more brilliant than they are and you will attain the heights of power. translation: be a toady and a yes man to your betters. this reads like an introduction course to renfields from a vampire. he uses the most fawning, disgusting examples to illustrate his points. the cautionary tale is Nicolas fouquet, louie the 14ths finance minister. he explains how he threw too big of a party and that upset the monarch, who felt upstaged. history says fouquet was another hedonistic thief. this guy asserts he just stole the bosses thunder and was punished for it. the reinforcement of the "law" is galileo. who flattered the medici's into a court appointment because he was tired of being a starving artist. sounds like modern academia is reading this book. manipulating science to their own ends for personal power and gain. I don't want to think this way about galileo. but...….its quite possibly true. this guy not only applauds it, but holds it up as an example of desireable behavior. I really, really detest this author. he goes on to explain that using your developed or God-given talents inspires insecurity in others. with those beneath you, don't worry about it. but tread carefully around your betters. they'll pretend to like you, but will tear you down at the first opportunity. he says don't fool yourself into thinking that the world has changed since the days of feudalism. there are kings and queens among us and you shouldn't shine too brightly around them or they'll cut you down. his example is the 16th century prince astorre Manfredi. who's city was taken by Cesare Borgia. Borgia allowed him to stay in power, unmolested to keep the population peaceful. a few weeks later he arrested him on charges of conspiracy, locked him up, murdered him, and tossed him in the river. his crime was, reportedly, simply outshining Borgia by being himself. he didn't know his role, and got killed for it. another example of this is Japanese. in the 16th century an artist had a statue of himself made wearing sandals. this was a sign of nobility. the emperor was going to execute him for it, but he opted to kill himself. at the end he states this is exempted when your "master" is spiraling. go ahead and outshine him. if you play it right you can replace him. my perspective and rebuttal: we are subservient only to god. if you are outshone in goodness, stand aside and let that person do all the good they can in the world. help them if you can. be humble and gracious. do your very best, all the time. if your "betters" don't like it and persecute you, shine even brighter. yes people have been killed for this, but they are also heroes whos voices echo throughout history as an inspiration to those who reject tyrants.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Kind of how I think myself. Been this way for a long time myself for the most part.

I figure I'm only on this planet for about 70 years or so roughly. One day I get off and most of the stuff isn't worth it. All I really go after for the most part is jews trying to genocide us whites and such time and time again or (((them))) trying to jew us into a Hell On Earth (HOE) situation.

I could care less for the most part if I die. I might care 5% or so at times. That's just because there's some things I'm really passionate about on this planet like 3D printing or candle making (Blessed Exorcism Salts added right now).

I'm only here for 70 years or so on Earth myself. 99.99% of the time it isn't worth my time. Doesn't mean I have a death wish either as I don't want to jew my soul the wrong way. I'm not tough myself, but I'm definitely not soft.

I don't care about really being cut down for the most part myself. Most things don't equate to anything in the after life. If I hit 170WPM - 220WPM in typing at some point. I see that alone more or so like being great at crosswords or some stupid silly game for the most part. I play the typing test like I'm going for a high score in a video game or a video game myself. It's stupid fun for the most part and it does help me (some video games do I figure). Trying to explain this to God in my mind. It doesn't make me any better and even arguing this could make me lesser especially if it were in Heaven or The Heavens is how I view it myself so I just lose at that point. Really means nothing in the long run. It's just more or so fun like a small video game in a certain realm or certain niche.

Where is typing test ability and/or speed in The Holy Bible?! God would of wanted me to help the poor or something in this realm alone not be egotistical or prideful about some type of stupid speed typing test, but I do like to have fun myself and such.

Don't bend over backwards for others and such to as well is what I figure as well. Don't jew your soul for others and it's definitely true to me personally that in many situations people will just take from you and never care about your well being or anything like that. Not always, but in many situations that has happened in the past from what I've seen in the world and/or experienced myself.

I go with don't compete with others unless it's some game of competition where everyone came to compete like maybe a game of chess and both parties are in agreement with competing or whatever. Don't compete with others is around success and/or failures and more or so in this realm.

Compete against myself is what I prefer the most. If I'm better at something than someone else. What does that even mean?

I could of been born into a drug addict family as a white guy and both my parents were high all the time and I didn't get proper schooling (maybe I had to work and such) to be able to even go to college and I was forced into basically working a minimum wage job myself since I didn't have the grades and/or ability or just the "opportunities" to go to college for that matter.

or

Some God forsaken situation where my parents were extremely poor and I didn't have the "opportunities" to really get out of it or go to college and such to be able to escape some nightmarish hellish reality.

I don't listen to slipknot anymore myself really.

slipknot - left behind - extremely poor nightmarish hellish reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1jQKpse7Yw

This is why I hate competing at times (stuff above). Imagining the white kid / white child growing up and is now the same age as me and is still very poor and basically has no other options in life or they are very limited.

That poor white kid / white child (same age as me - doesn't exist in this situation) didn't have the opportunities to be able to develop into something like myself.

But I can type 170 WPM - 220 WPM in the future though (maybe). Not saying it's being a "dick" or even an "asshole" here, but what is comparison even? He didn't have the same opportunities and/or options as me. Not saying my life was easy either though to as well. Saying not to compare though.

All that 170 WPM - 220 WPM typing speed test means really is just a video game high score if not just some personal high score and that's it. Easily say that's a video game nerd type thing and it doesn't really even mean anything to me even other than maybe I had fun and enjoyed doing it.

170 WPM - 220 WPM doesn't mean anything. Don't compete and more or so just listen to music and have fun trying to beat my score and/or being faster and faster each time. It's not worth it in the long run just that I can type really fast myself. I can't put it into words exactly, but that doesn't mean anything in the long run.

It's basically just a number (cool you can type really fast - who cares?!). I still do have the ability and/or skill / talent, but that's really only useful to myself and doesn't equate to anything spiritually or anything from The Holy Bible to as well.

People may be cooler than me and/or etc. I'm not jewing my soul to even care about them or their coolness level.

Only a fucking faggot wastes his time on getting 170 WPM - 220 WPM (talking to myself). I psychologically inject on my own mind as a PsyHacker alone. I get perspective at least from doing just that. Plus who cares it's just some speed on some site is all? It's really only useful and/or etc to me and not worth wasting my time to compete with anyone else. It's only really entertaining to me and such to as well and I just enjoy it while listening to music and such myself.

IDK this is kind of how I feel at times. This video kind of works well to explain it (not what he's saying exactly). It's just me (competing against myself) and the ice (whatever I'm doing) and no one else is there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvAQpSdcvno

What if there are no computers in the afterlife? I wasted my time if it was meant for something that only exists here on Earth alone. All I can do really is just enjoy it myself and have some fun. It didn't even mean anything at that point and doesn't equate to anything.

This to as well.

False existence - caring what other people think when it comes to material wealth alone or only doing it for other people to view me a certain way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cjd4kedaSq8

[–] • 1 pt

I don't know if that's a fast typing speed. seems like it is. I don't mind if you practice typing in a post. I rattle myself a lot. stream of consciousness. but it kind of seems like you are going for quantity over quality.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

It's up there at least. It helps me to grow as a typist, but overall I stay around 90-100 WPM myself or set my pace about here. It helps me to figure out what my problems are at a faster speed alone when it comes to mistakes my hands make at a faster speed.

60 WPM (words per minute) - would be 1 word a second. Can type 1 word a second (basically)

180 WPM (words per minute) - would be 3 words a second. Can type 3 words a second (basically).

If you go off like an average of 5.7 letters or something like that per word.

[–] • 1 pt

hey man, if you're going to do something you might as well try to be the best at it! good work!