one of the exceptions to this i would say is a fishing license. many lakes and rivers have to have fish bred for them and have the population upped so that the fish dont overfished
If the lake is on privately owned territory then this is valid, but the Government is inherently a criminal entity that has no right to own anything.
true im not arguing that. theres alot of lakes and rivers though that require being stocked up on. wouldnt be anything to fish if theyre over fished. whenever we all rise up and take over the corrupt government, fishing licenses will probably still be necisary.
its pretty retarded though that we're not allowed to collect rainwater and such things
Like I said, for licensing to happen, it has to be controlled by some private entity. The Government is a private entity like any other, except it promotes this fraudulent notion that it is a public entity. In the absence of Government, a lake could be claimed by a community of fishermen, maybe in the form of a co-op, if it wasn't already owned by one person. But anyone who says "This is public space." but tries to issue licenses to use the space, is a fraud and is the definition of the State, and deserves to be strung up and flayed in a grand public spectacle.
When a lake has no fish, fishermen don't go there. There would be a point of equilibrium, and the current system of pretending there are fish when you are fishing in a god damned farm is pathetic.
(post is archived)