Okay, so you don't enjoy him as a person, but what about his rhetoric? What about the substance of the things he entertains or speaks of?
Is your argument against solely his character, or the positions he asserts or defends?
This is pretty boring astroturf if you ask me. If you have questions, fucking as someone that knows what they're talking about instead of spouting off low-effort and boring diatribes about how entire groups of people aren't worth listening to just because you've been too lazy to put in the time to understand something.
Your infantile slander is jaded and pointless. Why should anyone entertain this?
As a person or even an entity upon my plane of existence.
Like you his constantly one upping of events, or baseless assumptions upon things that have zero causality.
Sure you can try to sound as if you are a voice of wisdom, but you are not.
All you can attack is character, not rhetoric.
It's pretty telling what you're doing here.
(post is archived)