WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

706

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

LOL

There is zero chance the Soviets would have acknowledged the achievement at the height of the Cold War if it had been a hoax. The Soviets tracked the mission the entire way. It was a big blow to their prestige.

[–] 0 pt

Unless the Cold War was also a hoax, which is a principle of the fake nukes theory.

(It was a hoax)

But let’s suppose that the Soviets wanted to “blow the whistle.” How would they have done this? They wouldn’t have been able to disprove what the Americans saw on television. Even now the shitty, cartoonishly fake footage is the only reason people believe in this obvious nonsense.

Soviet Union: “Attention Americans, the moon landings are fake, here’s some telemetry gobbledegook none of you understand that proves it.”

USA: “Attention Americans, disregard the latest Communist propaganda from our Eastern enemies claiming that the Apollo moon landings are fake.”

Plus all you’re doing is raising other questions that inevitably lead to the conclusion that Apollo was fake. Why the fuck would the Soviets cancel their program when they had beaten the US to every other landmark in the “space race?” Makes absolutely no sense. And why hasn’t any other country confirmed that the Apollo landings were real? Like I don’t know, take a fucking picture?

Here’s where I dare anyone to link the hilarious Wikipedia article about “third party evidence of the Apollo moon landings” which is one of my favorite articles because it actually contains zero evidence, just claims that evidence exists.

[–] 0 pt

Where does reality start for you? Are we in the matrix?

[–] 0 pt

Whenever I believed in the moon landings, I couldn’t help noticing that any well-reasoned argument against them was inevitably met with personal attacks rather than positive proof. It made me question it even more.