WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Consider this: The earth orbits the sun once every 365 days. All the while our local climate changes throughout the seasons.

The sun orbits the galaxy once every ~230 million years (galactic year).

Our Galaxy is constantly expanding and, (possibly), orbiting something even larger than we can conceive.

Point is... The Earth is in a location in space that it has "never" been in before. It is constantly and always will be in a new area of space forever. To think the energy distribution throughout space is equal seems naive. So does thinking that our local/global climate will remain the same forever without "change".

Consider this: The earth orbits the sun once every 365 days. All the while our local climate changes throughout the seasons. The sun orbits the galaxy once every ~230 million years (galactic year). Our Galaxy is constantly expanding and, (possibly), orbiting something even larger than we can conceive. Point is... The Earth is in a location in space that it has "never" been in before. It is constantly and always will be in a new area of space forever. To think the energy distribution throughout space is equal seems naive. So does thinking that our local/global climate will remain the same forever without "change".

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts 3y

It's solar output. Interstellar weather is dwarfed by the effect of the sun.

[–] 2 pts 3y

Hardly takes a genius to figure this out which makes me feel much less for my fellow men.

[–] 2 pts 3y

All of Canada, New England, NY state, Alaska and Minnesota were once covered by a mile high glacier. If people were around, they would complain that global warming was melting the glaciers and changing the environment. They were right. It changed.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 3y

Of course climate change is real. The evidence is in the ground layers.

Man-made climate change is dubious based on the carbon content of the atmosphere is pretty dubious.

Here's a wonderful comment I saved, by user@Gumbatronthat explains things much better than I ever could.

[–] 1 pt 3y

An example of Atmospheric CO2 data parameterization is showing a chart that measures CO2 in ppm over time. But in the ppm column the min-max values are 0-450. If it was 0-1000000 it would be a straight line.

This is what most fraudulent CO2 charts look like https://pic8.co/sh/tPFrTY.jpg

[–] 0 pt 3y

The science of climate change is irrelevant.

The only fact that matters is that climate change is a political movement. There is zero proof politicians can stagnate global climate. There is zero reason to believe that politicians would willingly end such a massive wealth and power grab by stagnanting climate change

[–] 0 pt 3y

I'm sad how people never think of this.

It's almost like they forget the 4 seasons exist and are surprised when summer is hot and winter is cold.

[+] [deleted] -4 pt 3y