>If you have a better solution, provide it. It depends on who you mean by "we". If you're referring to the state, then I don't think it's a good idea. Simply because the state is never held accountable, and it's far too easy to abuse the system such as - at some point - redefining anyone that doesn't want to work as needing to be cared for (like what happens now). I think private charities (or even church) on the other hand are a better provider because no one is compelled to give their money (like taxes), and it's in the charities best interests to be as efficient and frugal as possible. They're not going to be supporting career beggars. Finally, if someone chooses not to work, I don't think it's right to force them to, even if hey would die otherwise. No only does it go against my principles, but it's terribly inefficient.