WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

That might give him the advantage in some aspects right? Sure he'll fry every piece of electronics within x amount of miles from the blast but his boys are using rusted out AKs for the most part now so they'll be fine.

That might give him the advantage in some aspects right? Sure he'll fry every piece of electronics within x amount of miles from the blast but his boys are using rusted out AKs for the most part now so they'll be fine.

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

Your statement was worded ambiguously.

[–] 0 pt

EMPs knock out grids and the things attached to them, they do not permanently disable most vehicles, or man portable electronics that are not plugged into a wall outlet at time of blast. All those lil drones will survive so long as they can take the crash or are not in the air. Same with the anti tank rockets, and likely the tanks.

They are theoretically more effective at crippling civilian assets and creating humanitarian chaos ahead of an attack. Not in an already established war zone.

[–] 0 pt

Using a nuke instantly means nukes get used against Russia, which means all of their counter nukes get launched. Only (((they))) want that to happen.