Threats of use of force are a little different because the point is to be credible and achieve the effect of using force without using it. But it's easy to twist things into threats that aren't.
On the other hand, the second amendment acknowledges that government can become a threat to the people and thus they should always be a credible threat to corrupt government.
Threats of use of force are a little different because the point is to be credible and achieve the effect of using force without using it. But it's easy to twist things into threats that aren't.
On the other hand, the second amendment acknowledges that government can become a threat to the people and thus they should *always* be a credible threat to corrupt government.
(post is archived)