My issue is with people pushing their theory as if it's fact. I love intuitive building of fresh explanations for things, but keeping in mind that they are rough sketches that could work in general but might be totally wrong when you get down to details. That kind of thinking is scientific because you're weaving grand theories, trying to put together lots of different things, and then testing them out. It's important to not be attached to any one theory because then you will explain away conflicting observations rather than revise the theory. I know I and probably most people live in a very suppressed state of existence normally. I think a healthy, alive person would have a very active imagination and rich world, largely a subjective experience, but an experience that's tapped into the deeper insights we have into things. There science wouldn't be such a critical, dominating thing. It would fine-tune things but not be such a large mass of static, restricting ideas.