Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Rogan just won't listen to Walsh's point on the meaning and purpose of marriage. Rogan can only see it in the standard "what's wrong with gays getting married?" angle and personal choice. He cannot grasp what marriage is actually for, having and raising offspring in a stable environment, and that people pretending they're married and calling it that waters down the meaning and the respect for the institution. He just keeps whining on and on about "but what's the harm?" The faggots and child-free idiots can just call it co-habitation or something.

Rogan just won't listen to Walsh's point on the meaning and purpose of marriage. Rogan can only see it in the standard "what's wrong with gays getting married?" angle and personal choice. He cannot grasp what marriage is actually for, having and raising offspring in a stable environment, and that people pretending they're married and calling it that waters down the meaning and the respect for the institution. He just keeps whining on and on about "but what's the harm?" The faggots and child-free idiots can just call it co-habitation or something.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (22).
[–] • 1 pt

The reason people want to call their partnership marriage is to pretend that they are engaged in something more than they are. That's why they don't want to give up the term. It's a big trick they're playing on themselves to feel like they are contributing and are valuable members of society the way people raising families are. As Rogan admits, it's purely selfish. They just want to pursue their careers or hobbies. The more serious point is that these will always leave a big empty spot in a person (childless women experience this more acutely when they lose their looks/sexual market value).