Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Rogan just won't listen to Walsh's point on the meaning and purpose of marriage. Rogan can only see it in the standard "what's wrong with gays getting married?" angle and personal choice. He cannot grasp what marriage is actually for, having and raising offspring in a stable environment, and that people pretending they're married and calling it that waters down the meaning and the respect for the institution. He just keeps whining on and on about "but what's the harm?" The faggots and child-free idiots can just call it co-habitation or something.

Rogan just won't listen to Walsh's point on the meaning and purpose of marriage. Rogan can only see it in the standard "what's wrong with gays getting married?" angle and personal choice. He cannot grasp what marriage is actually for, having and raising offspring in a stable environment, and that people pretending they're married and calling it that waters down the meaning and the respect for the institution. He just keeps whining on and on about "but what's the harm?" The faggots and child-free idiots can just call it co-habitation or something.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (22).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

There were a lot of things Matt couldve said. Matt is about definition but failed to define marriage traditionally is between a man and woman. Gays can get a civil union, but its not a marriage as was defined by God in the bible. Joe's argument is a common one. Pints with Aquinas has a better take on this discussion. He was blocked from talking about it on jewtube.

https://rumble.com/v1sz5og-responding-to-joe-rogan-v-matt-walsh-on-gay-marriage.html