WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Rogan just won't listen to Walsh's point on the meaning and purpose of marriage. Rogan can only see it in the standard "what's wrong with gays getting married?" angle and personal choice. He cannot grasp what marriage is actually for, having and raising offspring in a stable environment, and that people pretending they're married and calling it that waters down the meaning and the respect for the institution. He just keeps whining on and on about "but what's the harm?" The faggots and child-free idiots can just call it co-habitation or something.

Rogan just won't listen to Walsh's point on the meaning and purpose of marriage. Rogan can only see it in the standard "what's wrong with gays getting married?" angle and personal choice. He cannot grasp what marriage is actually for, having and raising offspring in a stable environment, and that people pretending they're married and calling it that waters down the meaning and the respect for the institution. He just keeps whining on and on about "but what's the harm?" The faggots and child-free idiots can just call it co-habitation or something.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Listening to these two I was struck by how they appear to be talking at cross purposes. There really isn't much to be gleaned from listening to them here. That's not to say neither ever have anything of value to say or that one or the other is an idiot.

Walsh does seem to struggle making his points. Perhaps he was having an off night?

[–] 0 pt

Walsh definitely didn't deliver a focused, coherent rebuttal. But Rogan wasn't trying to understand. He kept responding in that whiny "but how are they harming marriage???????"

[–] 1 pt

Exactly. At first I thought Rogan was taking a contrarian position as much for the purpose of stimulating discussion as anything else. But it becomes clear that he's hung up on that point and just keeps coming back to it. Not a good day for either of them.