Most of the people complaining about urban sprawl and road design problems don't attempt to show a possible solution or transition. This guy's video helps to make it come into sight but it's still missing the network of financial incentives to create solutions.

There are problems but I think if you watched the whole video and understand the problems with NA road designs calling this WEF propaganda or the like is disingenuous.

The shape of a local economy can be seen in these examples, in houston and kansas city we see a mind numbing amount of dead space surrounding massive chain outlets and corporate buildings, chain outlets can help bring down prices with cheap wares but they harm local/small business and domestic production.

If we made the effort to convert the sprawl we could produce very european looking towns and cities that could have economic, energy, and transit efficiency benefits, along with securing some breathing room for domestic production and small business while protecting our monetary supply, but the cities would blow their budgets rapidly, the public would face hunger and violence(niggers and spics) and many would live in smaller homes, though it's likely design and furnishing would help us adapt for most of that square footage loss. Suburbs are often a soulless places with terrible inefficiency just like the stroads they so often demand but it's a mistake to think we should perfectly copy Europe in this, they have to make compromises as a result of some of these cities being over a thousand years old, and most being at least 500 years old.

Statistically speaking most humans have no problem with city living, I don't like it and you probably don't either but just because some people are content in an apartment or brownstone doesn't mean they want to put you in a pod.

A serious issue of pursuing such a drastic change would be abandoned cities and towns, if we started using our cities and eliminating 75-80% of paved surfaces we would create far more housing space, this would crash the home market in a given area and the first place to do it would probably take too many people from nearby towns or cities causing them to have a serious housing crash and leave holdouts with massive losses in equity when the town gets abandoned for lack of inhabitants to maintain and run it.

Like most meaningful reforms in this country it would only create more problems to do this before removing niggers and spics, and jews are the lynchpin holding them here, so we'd need to reduce our negroe pop by 90%, the spic pop by 60%+ and the jew population by 99.99% before I would seriously entertain these changes but once those issues are resolved crime and violence on public transport would evaporate and trolley's become a smart idea again and that would enable the transitionary period from drivable cities to walkable cities along with biking.

Think about the massive areas of former farmland or forest that are being taken up by all this suburban sprawl. Where I live most of the farms are getting turned into housing developments. Obviously nigger crime is a huge part of it, but so is shitty road design.

This faggot wants you to live in a pod.

High population density is the only way you can eliminate "stroads".

Stroads are great, they let us live out on big plots of land and still get were we want. We don't need to walk to these places and don't want walkers. This guy is a shit lib that just wants us to not have cars and big houses to save the environment and put us all in shit living conditions. He even missed the Floyd the Groid stat and attributed higher accident fatalities durning the covid lock down to stroads and not the fact cops who stopped pulling over niggers because it was deemed racist to make groids obey the law.

Wow another "fuck you cars are gay ride a train or bus" faggot.